this post was submitted on 17 Jan 2025
106 points (99.1% liked)

Ask Lemmy

27480 readers
1593 users here now

A Fediverse community for open-ended, thought provoking questions


Rules: (interactive)


1) Be nice and; have funDoxxing, trolling, sealioning, racism, and toxicity are not welcomed in AskLemmy. Remember what your mother said: if you can't say something nice, don't say anything at all. In addition, the site-wide Lemmy.world terms of service also apply here. Please familiarize yourself with them


2) All posts must end with a '?'This is sort of like Jeopardy. Please phrase all post titles in the form of a proper question ending with ?


3) No spamPlease do not flood the community with nonsense. Actual suspected spammers will be banned on site. No astroturfing.


4) NSFW is okay, within reasonJust remember to tag posts with either a content warning or a [NSFW] tag. Overtly sexual posts are not allowed, please direct them to either !asklemmyafterdark@lemmy.world or !asklemmynsfw@lemmynsfw.com. NSFW comments should be restricted to posts tagged [NSFW].


5) This is not a support community.
It is not a place for 'how do I?', type questions. If you have any questions regarding the site itself or would like to report a community, please direct them to Lemmy.world Support or email info@lemmy.world. For other questions check our partnered communities list, or use the search function.


6) No US Politics.
Please don't post about current US Politics. If you need to do this, try !politicaldiscussion@lemmy.world or !askusa@discuss.online


Reminder: The terms of service apply here too.

Partnered Communities:

Tech Support

No Stupid Questions

You Should Know

Reddit

Jokes

Ask Ouija


Logo design credit goes to: tubbadu


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] jet@hackertalks.com 11 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

A loop hole that is technically correct is still correct.

What is the purpose of marriage?

[–] MNByChoice@midwest.social 2 points 1 day ago

Legally it is a shortcut to establishment of a number of implied contracts, tells the courts how to unwind those contracts, and rights. In some cases the implied contracts are more effective than written ones. Medical decisions and visitation rights being first ones I can think of.

I sm not a lawyer.

[–] Flax_vert -4 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Two people bound together for life for the purposes of creating a family

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 12 hours ago

"You shouldn't use marriage to stop yourself being legally chained to your parents. The purpose of marriage is to legally chain you to your spouse."

If people could "divorce" their parents you wouldn't have to worry about this.

[–] jet@hackertalks.com 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

So divorce shouldn't be allowed in this philosophy?

[–] Flax_vert -4 points 22 hours ago

Only as a last resort. You shouldn't get married without intending to stay together for life.

[–] Ledivin@lemmy.world 1 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Yeah, you can miss me with the religious bullshit. This is a legal loophole in a legal system.

[–] Flax_vert -1 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a "man and a woman"

[–] ShepherdPie@midwest.social 2 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

Then what is your basis for it only being between two people? You're defining it just like religion does because that's where you got the idea even if you don't realize it.

[–] Flax_vert 0 points 6 hours ago

Because that's what marriage is and always has been, anything else is contrary to human nature

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 0 points 19 hours ago (1 children)

Only two? That seems needlessly restrictive. Is it for religious reasons? Church and state should be separated.

[–] Flax_vert -1 points 19 hours ago* (last edited 19 hours ago) (1 children)

If it was for religious reasons, I would have specified it as a "man and a woman"

Also, if it's more than two, that's not a marriage; that's a group chat.

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 13 hours ago

You still didn't explain why.