CileTheSane

joined 1 year ago
[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 9 hours ago

i have solutions.

And what exactly are your solutions? I know step 1 is to maintain a list of everyone people accuse of being conservative, what is step 2? I wouldn't want to speculate and put words in your mouth.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago

McConnell is kept "alive" by the curse on the USA that came about when it was built on top of an Indian burial ground.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 7 points 11 hours ago

The dark magic keeping him running is still going strong

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 5 points 11 hours ago

"Why? Did they visit a billionaire?"

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago) (2 children)

no. my METHODS align more with them

"I don't believe the same things they do, I just act in a way that is indistinguishable from them!"

"...Also the way they act is bad."

" It's okay when I do it though..."

effectively dismantling the current systems that produce suffering.

How does your list effectively dismantle those systems? Because it sounds like the purpose of the list is for after you have "won" and will be used to create more suffering.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (1 children)

but they are making lists. turnabout is fair play.

Are the people you are putting on your list the ones making lists?

I agree that anyone who is actively making a list of people they disagree with politically, with the obvious threat of punishing those people in the future, should themselves be made public and their attempts at terrorism brought to light. This also includes you.

How is your list being vetted? What prevents someone from adding you to the MAGAt list?

look, you've already made it abundantly clear that you are a weak pacifist

Right, I'm so weak that I don't go away when you try to push me...

so i doubt you're going to make a point that has any influence over the way i think.

You're not having a private conversation here that I'm intruding on. You are posting publicly trying to sway other people's opinions, so I am going to reply pointing out how horrendous what you're arguing for is. I'm not trying to convince you, I'm providing a different argument to the people you are trying to convince.

If you want to try to defend your argument you are welcome to do so. If you want to live in an echo chamber of only people who agree with you, you are free to block me. Just be aware that I will still be pointing out the glaring flaws in arguments after you do.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 12 hours ago (9 children)

It's not exactly "fighting back" when they're not fighting you now, and won't be fighting you in the future when you make use of your list.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 2 points 13 hours ago (11 children)

Fight back ≠ maintain a list of everyone who expresses something I disagree with so I can punish them in the future.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 0 points 13 hours ago

for the record, i care about what happens to the planet. sometimes i say i don't for the sake of my own ego.

No one said otherwise, did you reply to the wrong comment? Or did you not bother reading the previous comment before replying to it?

You've made it very clear that you want the planet to not have anyone on it who disagrees with you, and that's okay as long as you believe you are the "good guys." That's a talking point straight out of Israel.

we've spoken before.

I have no idea who you are so I guess your arguments weren't very compelling then either.

i think you are a weak person

Ad hominem does not discredit my points that your arguments sound the same as a fascist. If my argument is so "weak" it should be trivial to provide a counter argument.

there is probably no reason for us to continue speaking as our values don't align.

If you're only interested in communicating in an echo chamber of people who agree with you maybe this isn't the right place for you.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 13 hours ago* (last edited 13 hours ago)

Sheriff suggests keeping a list of people who disagree with him politically.

Most people: "that's horrifying!"

You: furiously takes notes

Pointing out the obvious hypocrisy doesn't mean I'm defending anyone. Both of you are terrible people that no one should listen to.

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (16 children)

I don't live in your third world country where the only way to beat fascism is with your own list of "undesirables" to purge as soon as you have the power to do so.

i care about what this planet looks like after i'm gone

It's starting to look pretty faschy to me either way.

there is no place for cowards any more.

But to be clear: you're not calling for violence right?

[–] CileTheSane@lemmy.ca 1 points 15 hours ago (2 children)

What sounds more like a threat of violence:

We’ll already have the addresses of the their New families...who supported their arrival!

Or

You feel safe with [group]? Say, whats your address?

?

 

This is a weird one.

I am subscribed to Risa@startrek.website When browsing on my phone I can see the thumbnails just fine. When browsing on my desktop ublock origin blocks the thumbnails and avatars, but only from the startrek.website instance, and only when I'm accessing it through Lemmy.ca

If I go directly to startrek.website I can view everything fine, and other instances I am not encountering this issue with. Any idea what might be the cause? I am using Firefox.

 

I can go to the main page of a Lemmy instance and see whatever is active on that instance at the time, but is there a way to get something like r/all for all federated instances?

view more: next ›