this post was submitted on 15 Jan 2025
387 points (91.1% liked)

Technology

60499 readers
4562 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Americans are joining the Chinese social media app en masse to protest an imminent TikTok ban.

  • American users have flocked to Chinese social media platform Xiaohongshu in defiance of security warnings.
  • Chinese and American users have engaged in surprisingly friendly conversations about each other’s lives.
  • The influx of American users could burden Xiaohongshu’s censorship mechanism, experts say.
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 34 points 1 day ago (4 children)

Because an American Spyware app is much better?

[–] xnx@slrpnk.net 18 points 16 hours ago (1 children)

It’s actually worse because the American spyware apps give our data to the government to prosecute us for abortions etc.

[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 7 points 13 hours ago

That's always been my point. China can do less with my data than the UK or America.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world -3 points 8 hours ago (3 children)

Well, the American one doesn't have an incentive to turn its own people against its own government with propaganda. As is happening with Tiktok and pushing pro-CCP and anti-American content.

And even if the only concern was spying, it's like saying "well a creep on the street snapped a nude photo of me through my windows, so I may as well take my own nudes and pass it around the neighbourhood."

[–] aarRJaay@lemm.ee 2 points 7 hours ago (1 children)

because no US social media has ever affected an election?

[–] holo@lemmy.wtf 0 points 4 hours ago (1 children)

You want to know how to turn an American against the US government? Tell them, without exaggeration, what their government is doing to them; and tell them, without exaggeration, what other governments do for their citizens.

It's that simple. No lies needed. No american with an IQ above a glass of undrinkable tap water likes their government or thinks their country is worth anything.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

No american with an IQ above a glass of undrinkable tap water likes their government or thinks their country is worth anything.

Complete false dichotomy. This isn't a "my government can beat up your government" squabble.

The reality is that ByteDance has offices for CCP officials in their buildings. The Chinese government has a direct line of influence on the people who work at that company. A government that has openly hostile relations with the West (not even just the USA).

This isn't a discussion about whose government is better. It would be equally inappropriate for a US entity with direct control from the US gov to directly influence Chinese people via an algorithm to push propaganda. The Chinese firewall prevents such a thing from existing or having any significant impact, whereas the opposite isn't true.

[–] holo@lemmy.wtf 0 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

All of that non sequitur is great, but the fact is no foreign country needs to do anything to make Americans hate their government. Nothing. Except provide a platform that allows free speech.

That's all Tiktok is.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

but the fact is no foreign country needs to do anything to make Americans hate their government.

No one was arguing about making Americans hate their government. The argument is about TikTok being a pro-CCP propaganda tool. That's it.

You keep bringing it back to "hating America", when that was never the point.

What you're saying is actually a typical diversionary tactic that pro-CCP people use. Shift the target of the argument away from the CCP, exactly the way you did.

[–] holo@lemmy.wtf 0 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

Please read the output of your LLMs if you're going to use them, you said:

Well, the American one doesn't have an incentive to turn its own people against its own government with propaganda. As is happening with Tiktok and pushing pro-CCP and anti-American content.

It's simply not. It's allowing Americans to speak freely on America without government interference.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 8 minutes ago

Oh I'm sorry. You're right. I shall read my LLMs more carefully. /s

It's allowing Americans to speak freely on America without government interference.

Another way to look at it is that It's allowing anyone to speak negatively about Western governments.

And the point I was making is that TikTok is pushing pro-CCP propaganda; regardless if it's anti-American or not, but that's the part you keep focusing on.

And everyone keeps going on about "censorship from the gov" but the reality is that I see tons of posts, videos, blogs, articles, reels, etc on US based social media that says all kinds of stuff about the US, Canadian, UK, European, etc, governments. It's just so odd to me that Americans are so hyperfocused on "free speech" when I see all that stuff everywhere anyways. Half the time it's literally videos FROM TikTok that are just reposted elsewhere.

The main difference is that on TikTok there's a higher number of wack jobs that peddle garbage like flat earth, chem trails, anti vaxx, etc. The difference is that on Western social media that content usually comes with a disclaimer. The CCP is more than glad to allow that content because none of their citizens will see it. Chinese people can't see content on TikTok, they have a segregated version with completely different content for Chinese users. If the CCP cared about freedom, there would be no segregation.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 0 points 5 hours ago (1 children)
[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

There have been multiple studies that have demonstrated that pro-CCP content outweighs anti-CCP content by at least 3 to 1. Even on profiles that prefer anti-CCP content the pro content still gets suggested at a 3 to 1 ratio.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 3 hours ago (1 children)

Surely you'd be willing to share those studies then? Because the only one I've seen was NCRI who didn't make that claim and are hilariously biased.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

No. I'm not doing research for you. Even if I did, we both know you'd either dismiss it or ignore it. I'm a nobody to you and you're already biased against what I have to say.

We won't see eye to eye on this. We simply won't agree. It would just be a waste of my time.

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world -1 points 1 hour ago (1 children)

I'm not asking you to do research. I'm asking you to show research you've presumably already done.

[–] CeeBee_Eh@lemmy.world 2 points 54 minutes ago (1 children)

I don't keep links to things I've read over the years. You really think I have a folder on my desktop labelled "CCP Propaganda Proof" with various docs and links?

[–] Maggoty@lemmy.world 1 points 15 minutes ago

I think you should if you're going to make such statements. All you need to do is save your comments where you've used those links. Then you can link to those comments.

[–] TORFdot0@lemmy.world 14 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Why not ban both if we are concerned about the harms of algorithmic content?

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 5 points 18 hours ago

Think of the shareholders!

[–] Murvel@lemm.ee 24 points 1 day ago (1 children)