this post was submitted on 28 Dec 2024
22 points (95.8% liked)

Casual Conversation

2002 readers
219 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES (updated 01/22/25)

  1. Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
  2. Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
  3. Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
  4. Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
  5. No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
  6. Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Lots this week as I took time off work and was sick in bed for a chunk of it ..

  • Anora. Superb movie.
  • The fountain. This one wasn't for me so much.
  • Juror #2. Enjoyed this one but it ran a little longer than I felt it could have.
  • The fighter. You get what you're expecting here. Decent popcorn flick.
  • Biosphere. Weird one but fun. Way better than the IMDB score imo.
  • The long kiss goodnight. Saw it recommended on here as a decent alternative to Die Hard as a Christmas movie and I'd agree. Very 90's.
  • Legend. Story of the Kray twins who were London gangsters in the 60's. Tom Hardy is very good as usual.
  • Anti matter. Low budget sci-fi. Decent idea but the implementation was middling. Still enjoyed it.

That's about it. A solid week of movies I'd say. :)

[–] HubertManne@moist.catsweat.com 1 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

came so close to watching the long kiss goodnight but have been wanting fantasy or scifi.

[–] khannie@lemmy.world 1 points 4 weeks ago

Ah to be honest it's not fantastic. It's just a solid alternative to Die Hard. Definitely a one and done but worth seeing.