this post was submitted on 17 Dec 2024
519 points (93.0% liked)

memes

10637 readers
2796 users here now

Community rules

1. Be civilNo trolling, bigotry or other insulting / annoying behaviour

2. No politicsThis is non-politics community. For political memes please go to !politicalmemes@lemmy.world

3. No recent repostsCheck for reposts when posting a meme, you can only repost after 1 month

4. No botsNo bots without the express approval of the mods or the admins

5. No Spam/AdsNo advertisements or spam. This is an instance rule and the only way to live.

Sister communities

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 159 points 1 day ago (7 children)

Meanwhile Google search results:

  • AI summary
  • 2x "sponsored" result
  • AI copy of Stackoverflow
  • AI copy of Geeks4Geeks
  • Geeks4Geeks (with AI article)
  • the thing you actually searched for
  • AI copy of AI copy of stackoverflow
[–] rescue_toaster@lemm.ee 81 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Should we put bets on how long until chatgpt responds to anything with:

Great question, before i give you a response, let me show you this great video for a new product you'll definitely want to check out!

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 5 points 16 hours ago

Nah, it'll be more subtle than that. Just like Brawno is full of the electrolytes plants crave, responses will be full of subtle product and brand references marketers crave. And A/B studies performed at massive scales in real-time on unwitting users and evaluated with other AIs will help them zero in on the most effective way to pepper those in for each personality type it can differentiate.

[–] sleen@lemmy.zip 35 points 1 day ago

"Great question, before i give you a response, let me introduce you to raid shadow legends!"

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 20 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] TheTechnician27@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 23 hours ago (1 children)
[–] ZeroHora@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 hours ago

Username checks out

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 32 points 1 day ago (3 children)

Google search is literally fucking dogshit and the worst it has EVER been. I'm starting to think fucking duckduckgo (relies on Bing) gives better results at this point.

[–] Lootboblin@lemmy.world 4 points 6 hours ago

Ive been using only duckduck for years now. If I don’t find something there, I dont need it.

[–] Aielman15@lemmy.world 26 points 1 day ago (5 children)

I have been using Duck for a few years now and I honestly prefer it to Google at this point. I'll sometimes switch to Google if I don't find anything on Duck, but that happens once every three or four months, if that.

[–] Crackhappy@lemmy.world 7 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I only go to the googs for maps.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 3 points 1 day ago (2 children)
[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 1 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

To this day any time I navigate somewhere with Google maps while someone else separately navigates there with apple maps, we end up at different places. More often than not, I'm where we both should've ended up.

[–] radiohead37@lemmynsfw.com 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

Interesting. In my experience, google maps is “too creative” on their routes. They usually send me to some back roads that only make my drive much longer.

[–] Soggy@lemmy.world 2 points 15 hours ago

I suspect that Google Maps preemptively routes some percentage of drivers through alternate directions in order to ease congestion. (Because if Maps tells you that the obvious route will get you there in thirty minutes and it takes an hour then you're going to be mad at Maps)

Regardless of their route choices, Maps is always solid with ETA for me and it has access to a ton of traffic data.

[–] corsicanguppy@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 day ago

I can't afford the water damage to the car.

[–] teft@lemmy.world 3 points 1 day ago

Same here. I only switch to google to search for images for memes. For some reason bing has a harder time finding random star trek scenes.

[–] DiabolicalBird@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago

The one thing Google still has over Duck for me at this point is reddit results. So much niche information is stored on that site, but they've blocked anyone other than Google from crawling the site so other engines can't index past the point they changed that policy.

[–] someguy3@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I use ddg but find Google gives better results and Google's snippet feature still rocks.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago

Careful. People here get mad about that for some reason. Like you can't think Google sucks but that their search engine is still better than others. And people will argue with you that Google is way worse than anything else. I don't know what planet they are from.

[–] FeelzGoodMan420@eviltoast.org 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like AI in search engines but even duckduckgo's AI is better lol.

[–] laurelraven@lemmy.zip 2 points 20 hours ago

And they let you turn it off

[–] Kyle_The_G@lemmy.world 10 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I'm in sciences and the AI overview gives wrong answers ALL THE TIME. If students or god forbid professionals rely on it thats bad news.

[–] spankmonkey@lemmy.world 6 points 1 day ago

Isn't it funny that a lot of people were worried that wikipedia would be unreliable because anyone could edit it, then turned out pretty reliable, but AI is being pushed hard despite being even more unreliable than the worst speculation about wikipedia?

Being for profit excuses being shitty I guess.

AI is so fucking cap. There is no way to know if the information is accurate. It's completely unreliable.

[–] sp3tr4l@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

We have new feature, use it!

No, its broken and stupid, I prefer old feature.

... Fine!

breaks old feature even harder

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

I’ve used Google since 2004. I stopped using it this year because as the parent comment points out, it’s all marketing and AI. I like Qwant but it’s not perfect but it functions like a previous version of Google.

[–] TrickDacy@lemmy.world 2 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I have tried a few replacements for Google but I've yet to find anything remotely as effective for searches about things close to me. Like if I'm looking for a restaurant near me, kagi, startpage, and DDG are not good. Is qwant good for a use case like that? Haven't heard about it before.

[–] PerogiBoi@lemmy.ca 2 points 18 hours ago

I’ve had some success but it goes off of your ISPs server location so for me it’s not very useful.

[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 2 points 22 hours ago

I have not enjoyed Qwant - tried it as my default but I'm back to DDG. I just want a functional Google again (boolean operators please...)

[–] NielsBohron@lemmy.world 5 points 1 day ago

yeah, but at least we can vet that shit better that the unsourced and hallucinated drivel provided by ChatGPT

[–] CluckN@lemmy.world 4 points 1 day ago

Even adding, “Reddit” after a search only brings up posts from 7 years ago.

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 1 points 1 day ago

The irony is that Gemini Pro is actually better than ChatGPT (which is not saying a ton, as OpenAI have completely stagnated and even some small open models are better now), but whatever they use for search is beyond horrible.