this post was submitted on 01 Dec 2024
734 points (97.8% liked)

The Onion

4602 readers
520 users here now

The Onion

A place to share and discuss stories from The Onion, Clickhole, and other satire.

Great Satire Writing:

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 37 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (4 children)

Next thing you'll tell my "state's rights" had nothing to do with states or preserving rights. /s

[–] kameecoding@lemmy.world 9 points 2 days ago

When someone says State Rights, your response should be, "state's rights to do what?"

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 5 points 2 days ago

The civil war was about states' rights.

States' rights to not send escaped slaves back to their home states where slavery is legal. The South wanted to force the North to give return escaped slaves. The North said no, if they come here they're free. So the South started a war about it, because they didn't want the states to have the right to make their own decisions about slavery. The South wouldn't put up with any state supporting slaves who relocated to within its borders.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (3 children)

I am not bound by your limited imagination. Just because you disagree with me doesn’t mean you can just declare that I am “pro slavery.” That’s no better than declaring that people who are against the genocide in.m Gaza must suddenly be “antisemitic“.

If your position is so weak that you have to rely on flagrant lies and ridiculous falsehoods, then perhaps you should reassess your position. Mine is not your problem. And if you have to lie to make your point, it can’t be much of a point at all.

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I see that I should have added an \s.

[–] curbstickle@lemmy.dbzer0.com 18 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I thought it was quite obvious, FWIW.

[–] SaharaMaleikuhm@feddit.org 9 points 2 days ago
[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 9 points 2 days ago

No, no you didn't.

Even "/s" wouldn't have prevented those replies.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago
[–] kux@lemm.ee 1 points 2 days ago

there is never any reason to do so

[–] dragonfucker@lemmy.nz 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Mate, @henfredemars@infosec.pub was agreeing with you. There's no fight here, you're attacking ghosts.

[–] EleventhHour@lemmy.world -4 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

What an appropriate username. Clearly, an enlightened individual.

Perhaps you should stick to your hobby instead of trolling other people’s conversations.

Don’t bother replying, because I’ve blocked you. Unless, of course, you’re only trolling for upvotes…

[–] ayyy@sh.itjust.works 0 points 2 days ago

I’m just asking questions