this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2024
744 points (96.9% liked)

News

23413 readers
3569 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I think we agree that it is important to consider parallels in history, but the US is not 1930s Germany.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

The U.S. is almost exactly like 1930s Germany in 1932. It's not 1933 yet.

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

Germany is roughly 138,000 square miles in size, while the USA is approximately 4,000,000 square miles.

The population of Germany in the 1930's was roughly 60,000,000, the population of the US today, closer to 400,000,000.

The US does not share an international border with 10 different countries.

That's just for starters. So while I agree there are parallels, there are a lot more differences that you're not accounting for.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I don't think you're stupid and I think you're able to read context, so why you're pretending I wasn't talking about the political atmosphere and playing this "well actually" game, I don't know.

[–] TunaCowboy@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago

I really don't want to argue, and my original comment was a direct response to your assertion that armed resistance in the US (if warranted) is essentially futile.

Again, yes there are parallels, which I continue to acknowledge, but the US is not Germany in a ton of relevant ways. Subsequently, a direct comparison between 1930's Germany and 2025 US is inherently flawed, in regard to armed resistance - the main topic of your own original comment.

Is it possible that while you were busy erroneously ad homineming me with an accusation of ''well actually(ing)' you, that it was you who missed context? Or are you pretending I wasn't talking about the topic of the comment I replied to and playing a 'well actually' game?

My reply to you was not hostile, why default to treating me adversarially? Why instead of discussing the topic that you brought up would you force me into this exhausting position? I believe you can do better than reddit tier.