this post was submitted on 24 Nov 2024
239 points (90.5% liked)

World News

39347 readers
4075 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

A new book, Ricardo’s Dream by Nat Dyer, reveals that Sir Isaac Newton’s wealth was closely tied to the transatlantic slave trade during his tenure as master of the mint at the Bank of England.

Newton profited from gold mined by enslaved Africans in Brazil, much of which was converted into British currency under his oversight, earning him a fee for each coin minted.

While Newton’s scientific legacy remains untarnished, the book highlights his financial entanglement with slavery, a common thread among Britain’s banking and finance elites of the era.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 0 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

He created new trade routes between continents and got thrown to jail because of his claim of the new continent. You know, politics.

But sure, slavery is not ruthless.

Fucking morons and their double standards.

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago) (1 children)

Those don't sound like huge accomplishments. So why should we care?

Also, you aren't specifying what was being traded and I think we both know why.

[–] TurboHarbinger@feddit.cl 1 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

so should we also undermine Newton's accomplishments because he also used slaves for trade?

fucking idiotic cancel culture, bunch of hypocrites

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 1 points 3 weeks ago

I know it's hard to read the article, but you could at least read OP's summary:

While Newton’s scientific legacy remains untarnished, the book highlights his financial entanglement with slavery, a common thread among Britain’s banking and finance elites of the era.

By the way, you're just wrong about why Columbus was brought back to Spain and imprisoned. For someone who is so concerned about historical reputations, you don't really seem to care much about history.

Or reading.