Linux

48331 readers

379 users here now

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Linux is a family of open source Unix-like operating systems based on the Linux kernel, an operating system kernel first released on September 17, 1991 by Linus Torvalds. Linux is typically packaged in a Linux distribution (or distro for short).

Distributions include the Linux kernel and supporting system software and libraries, many of which are provided by the GNU Project. Many Linux distributions use the word "Linux" in their name, but the Free Software Foundation uses the name GNU/Linux to emphasize the importance of GNU software, causing some controversy.

Rules

Posts must be relevant to operating systems running the Linux kernel. GNU/Linux or otherwise.
No misinformation
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, etc

Related Communities

Community icon by Alpár-Etele Méder, licensed under CC BY 3.0

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml

nooter692@lemmy.ml

MarcellusDrum@lemmy.ml

cypherpunks@lemmy.ml

cyclohexane@lemmy.ml

d3Xt3r@lemmy.nz

117

What's the most obscure distro you can think of (slrpnk.net)

submitted 1 week ago by countrypunk@slrpnk.net to c/linux@lemmy.ml

198 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 25 points 1 week ago (5 children)

elive

you think a distribution that automatically includes all the proprietary stuff that we use baked into the distro would be more popular since it makes linux ready to go for most people; but it still gets fewer than 300 clicks per month.

[–] GolfNovemberUniform@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 week ago (1 children)

automatically includes all the proprietary stuff

Jail.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

They've been able to figure it out so far

[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 13 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Doesn't Pop!OS do that already?

[–] fartsparkles@sh.itjust.works 4 points 1 week ago

And Ubuntu, no? Wasn’t that the big selling point of Ubuntu back in the day?

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 week ago

Yes, as far as they're allowed to in this country

[–] Ephera@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 week ago

I feel like the Enlightenment desktop environment isn't to everyone's taste. It's definitely got some idiosyncratic design choices...

[–] secret300@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

First I'm hearing of it. I'ma try it out

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 week ago

It made me lazy since they got everything to work out of the box. Lol

[–] jlow@beehaw.org 1 points 1 week ago

This. People always go "It looks like MacOS" but to me esp the icons just look like outdated Linux Mint/Cinnamon from 15 years ago. If people like ot that's cool, it's just not for me.

[–] mitrosus@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Its unpopularity may be related to that it asks money or a positive review in a blog to even try. Used to be so a few years ago.

[–] eldavi@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 days ago

i wasn't aware that it had changed like that; i stopped using it when i switch to linux laptops from linux companies like tuxedo and system76