this post was submitted on 12 Nov 2024
519 points (99.1% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2561 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Summary

Ukraine’s military intelligence reported finding Western-made components inside Russian decoy drones, used in recent swarm attacks to overwhelm Ukrainian air defenses.

Dubbed “Parody,” these decoys are cheaper than Iran’s Shahed-136 drones but can mimic their radar signatures, creating fake targets to distract defenses.

Russia reportedly launched over 2,000 drones last month, half of which were decoys, with some crashing in Moldova, raising regional security concerns.

Despite sanctions, Western technology continues to appear in Russian weapons, complicating efforts to restrict Moscow’s drone capabilities.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 165 points 1 week ago (3 children)

The Ukrainian government has a vast list of all the electronics they are finding in Russian weapons and where they came from. It's actually pretty impressive.

https://war-sanctions.gur.gov.ua/en/components

[–] R3DACT3D@lemmynsfw.com 44 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] NobodyElse@sh.itjust.works 33 points 1 week ago (1 children)

As some old guy said, “Merchants have no country. The mere spot they stand on does not constitute so strong an attachment as that from which they draw their gains.”

[–] R3DACT3D@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 week ago

that old guy nailed it!

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 21 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Ferengi rule of aquisition #34: War is good for business.

[–] FordBeeblebrox@lemmy.world 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)

#35: Peace is good for business

Have we tried that yet?

[–] Vikthor@lemmy.world 4 points 1 week ago

Have you tried asking that in Kremlin?

[–] Pacattack57@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago

Unfortunately peace is not good for business.

[–] racemaniac@lemmy.dbzer0.com 16 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Looking at that list, most things look like very basic components that can be easily found on aliexpress, and thus in China, and thus probably easy to get for Russia. Are we going to forbid selling those components to China or how is this supposed to work? (genuinely curious)

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 12 points 1 week ago

I think there's just no way to avoid middle men here. Not with a global supply chain.

[–] explodicle@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 week ago

That is basically how ITAR export controls work, but only for much more complicated weapon parts like nukes and fighter jets. It's basically impossible to stop the flow of stuff that any country can make. The parts in this article would likely fall under EAR99, explicitly allowed to sell to any not-embargoed country.

Source: was a business area export representative (BAER) and yes I know this is an oversimplification

[–] LANIK2000@lemmy.world 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nice! Would be funny if companies were fined by how much of their shit made it there.

[–] GoodEye8@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago

Someone probably should the governmental stick up their ass for this. I'm pretty sure all the parts that end up in Russian arsenal have export restrictions and should, in theory, have strict oversight. You can't just export into another country and forget about it. If those parts want to be to be exported into another country that information should come back to the seller(or the government agency, don't really remember the specifics) who then have to give clearance for that and any future exports. But you can't keep track of under the table deals. Hopefully this gets investigated and justice is served but I don't have much faith.