this post was submitted on 20 Oct 2024
391 points (84.4% liked)

Fediverse

28514 readers
472 users here now

A community to talk about the Fediverse and all it's related services using ActivityPub (Mastodon, Lemmy, KBin, etc).

If you wanted to get help with moderating your own community then head over to !moderators@lemmy.world!

Rules

Learn more at these websites: Join The Fediverse Wiki, Fediverse.info, Wikipedia Page, The Federation Info (Stats), FediDB (Stats), Sub Rehab (Reddit Migration), Search Lemmy

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

cross-posted from: https://feddit.nl/post/16246531

I feel like we need to talk about Lemmy's massive tankie censorship problem. A lot of popular lemmy communities are hosted on lemmy.ml. It's been well known for a while that the admins/mods of that instance have, let's say, rather extremist and onesided political views. In short, they're what's colloquially referred to as tankies. This wouldn't be much of an issue if they didn't regularly abuse their admin/mod status to censor and silence people who dissent with their political beliefs and for example, post things critical of China, Russia, the USSR, socialism, ...

As an example, there was a thread today about the anniversary of the Tiananmen Massacre. When I was reading it, there were mostly posts critical of China in the thread and some whataboutist/denialist replies critical of the USA and the west. In terms of votes, the posts critical of China were definitely getting the most support.

I posted a comment in this thread linking to "https://archive.ph/2020.07.12-074312/https://imgur.com/a/AIIbbPs" (WARNING: graphical content), which describes aspects of the atrocities that aren't widely known even in the West, and supporting evidence. My comment was promptly removed for violating the "Be nice and civil" rule. When I looked back at the thread, I noticed that all posts critical of China had been removed while the whataboutist and denialist comments were left in place.

This is what the modlog of the instance looks like:

Definitely a trend there wouldn't you say?

When I called them out on their one sided censorship, with a screenshot of the modlog above, I promptly received a community ban on all communities on lemmy.ml that I had ever participated in.

Proof:

So many of you will now probably think something like: "So what, it's the fediverse, you can use another instance."

The problem with this reasoning is that many of the popular communities are actually on lemmy.ml, and they're not so easy to replace. I mean, in terms of content and engagement lemmy is already a pretty small place as it is. So it's rather pointless sitting for example in /c/linux@some.random.other.instance.world where there's nobody to discuss anything with.

I'm not sure if there's a solution here, but I'd like to urge people to avoid lemmy.ml hosted communities in favor of communities on more reasonable instances.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works 25 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (7 children)

Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works don't seem to have any noticeable political leanings (far right or far left) as far as I can tell. Why do you say they're right leaning?

[–] brucethemoose@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago

Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works don’t seem to have any noticeable political leanings as far as I can tell.

...What?

I consider myself a raging liberal, at least in the US. A socialist. But lemmy.world is so liberal it makes me feel like a Trumpster.

I guess I don't feel at risk of getting globally banned like I would for disagreeing with the consensus like on .ml, but claiming .world is neutral is quite a sweeping statement.

[–] Stovetop@lemmy.world 11 points 1 month ago

There are definitely some bad actors on here who are trying to manipulate the election in Trump's favor. The sort that claim to be leftists and come to every US politics-related thread (or even ones that aren't related to the US until they make it so) with their list of talking points about why no one should vote for Harris, but conveniently have no answers for who deserves votes more.

[–] ArcaneSlime@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago

Because anyone not exactly in line with his views is right leaning, that's it. Tankies want to shame you into their ideology by calling you right leaning for thinking murder is bad, that's basically all.

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

I can DM you if you want, this is already spiraling far beyond my intentions of my original statement, that I think it's better rather than to consolidate communities and overpower an instances mods and admins, to decentralize and replicate so there's always a space for people, on an as-needed basis.

The short answer is that Lemmy.world is a very US-focused liberal instance, essentially the Democrats embodied in an instance.

Sh.itjust.works maintains NCD, MeanwhileOnGrad, and other generally pro-Liberalism, anti-Communist communities, hence why I say it leans right.

As always, you can absolutely find Anarchists and Communists on both Lemmy.world and sh.itjust.works, my point is more that the moderators and userbase generally consolidate around a given stance, my point isn't that you can't be a leftist on Lemmy.world or sh.itjust.works.

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago (1 children)

from the perspective of a south american, yes, .world is biased towards north america and europe.

[–] DudeImMacGyver@sh.itjust.works -1 points 1 month ago

That's not really what I mean, I'm talking about leaning far right or left on the political spectrum. I think both of them are based in NA, so it would make sense they're more focused there, just like midwest.social

[–] givesomefucks@lemmy.world 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

World is kind of the vanilla instance.

Just.works is a "free speech" instance, I never see many communities hosted there, but a large amount of trolls make accounts there because just.works is unlikely to nuke an account.

[–] Draconic_NEO@lemmy.world 5 points 1 month ago

Lately sh.itjust.works been more good about nuking spam and troll accounts, and they also have automated defenses set up to mitigate abuse.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I don't fully understand but it turns out if you don't think both Donald and Harris are equally fascist you are a classic liberal and pretty far to the right.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They're not equally fascist.

It's fascism lite vs fascism deluxe!

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Right? The system is awful that lite is the best of the options that will actually happen. And yet here you are, every day campaigning for fascism deluxe by telling everyone who chooses lite that they are genocidal goose-steppers.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Harris wouldn't support genocide if she knew it would cost her the election. There would be an arms embargo by now if it weren't for her voters reassuring her; "No no, it's okay! You can kill anyone you want and start WW3 and we'll still vote for you."

But calling you all genocidal goose-steppers isn't fair. You're just cynical. You fundamentally do not believe you can change anything.

[–] barsquid@lemmy.world -1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Sure. But unfortunately the country is so diseased with far-right radicals that even for people absolutely opposed to Gaza as a primary motivation, such as Uncommitted (you going to call them genocidal as well?), she is still the least bad option.

But that's kinda my point, though. Anybody with radical ideas like "Donald will make this worse," will fail .ml purity testing, regardless of their stance on economics. And so much so that you'll call them a goose-stepper.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml -3 points 1 month ago

Again, like I said, calling y'all genocidal goose-steppers wasn't fair of me to do. I'm sorry I hurt your feelings. I was mad.

Your cynicism is a tragedy. You can only imagine two outcomes. Either everything gets worse under Trump or things stay as bad as they are right now under Harris. There's no other options in your mind. You are too cynical to imagine anything else.

And so you attack anyone who refuses to vote for genocide and then get offended when they strike back. Did it occur to you that I was lashing out because other .world posters were dogpiling on me in various threads and attacking me? Or do my feelings not matter?