this post was submitted on 10 Oct 2024
187 points (94.7% liked)

World News

39004 readers
2693 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

The government is again trying to insert itself into women’s childbearing decisions, knocking on doors and making calls with questions some find downright invasive.

The first time a government worker encouraged Yumi Yang to have a baby, she thought little of it. She and her husband were registering their marriage at a local office in northeastern China, and the worker gave them free prenatal vitamins, which she chalked up to the government trying to be helpful.

When an official later called to ask if she had taken them, and then called again after she did get pregnant to track her progress, Ms. Yang shrugged those questions off as well intentioned, too. But then officials showed up at her door after she had given birth, asking to take a photograph of her with her baby for their files. That was too much.

“When they came to my home, that was really ridiculous,” said Ms. Yang, 28. “I felt a little disgusted.”

Faced with a declining population that threatens economic growth, the Chinese government is responding with a time-tested tactic: inserting itself into this most intimate of choices for women, whether or not to have a child.

Officials are not just going door to door to ask women about their plans. They have partnered with universities to develop courses on having a “positive view of marriage and childbearing.” At high-profile political gatherings, officials are spreading the message wherever they can.


Non-paywall link

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] serpineslair@lemmy.world 41 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Well... Isn't that ironic?

[–] False@lemmy.world 13 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Too many spoons when all you need is a knife

[–] Timecircleline@sh.itjust.works 21 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Too many dudes when all you need is a wife.

[–] dubyakay@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 month ago

Ass is the pussy of the twenty-first century!

[–] FlyingSquid@lemmy.world 0 points 1 month ago

It really did rain on my wedding day, but nothing felt ironic about it.

[–] jeffw@lemmy.world 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

To be fair, the one child policy is pretty misunderstood by most people

[–] NOT_RICK@lemmy.world 18 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why because it didn’t apply to most Chinese families? A two child limit did for most though, and that’s still below the replacement rate. I think the irony sticks

[–] captain_aggravated@sh.itjust.works 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Something you learn in flight school is how not to over-correct.

[–] greybeard@lemmy.one 3 points 1 month ago

PID tuning is an art.