UPDATE: Apparently the guitar was not signed (or certified) by Taylor Swift afterall. 🤣
this post was submitted on 30 Sep 2024
695 points (97.2% liked)
Political Weirdos
742 readers
845 users here now
A community dedicated to the weirdest people involved in politics.
- Focus on weird behaviors and beliefs
- Follow Iemmy.world TOS
- Don’t be a jerk
founded 3 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
What's the difference if the animals were going to be slaughtered anyway?
I wish I was brave enough to be vegetarian but I'm not.
I would say that ethically, hunting an animal that has lived a normal, free life is very different from hunting an animal that's been a captive all its life. Especially if the former is done for reasons other than sport. Deer hunting is necessary in a lot of places because the elimination of their natural predators requires it. Otherwise the population would explode and there would be mass starvation.
Sometimes hunting actually reduces suffering for the species as a whole. On top of that, deer hunters usually eat at least part of their kill even if they keep some of it as a trophy.
Fair enough. I live in West Virginia in a neighborhood where deer walk around sometimes 14 deep. They aren't scared of people or cars. I have a deep understanding of how deer hunting prevents a far worse situation. And deer meat is good.
As to your point, it's a good one. I'm just saying these animals were going to live a shitty life and be slaughtered anyway so why would the method of execution matter as long as it is painless as possible.