this post was submitted on 27 Sep 2024
122 points (96.9% liked)

okmatewanker

640 readers
263 users here now

No foul language - i.e. French 🤮

Obviously satire, dozy wankers

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
bernieecclestoned
flamingos
122
Britain was not the... wealthiest of Roman conquests (lemmy.world)
submitted 1 month ago by GreatAlbatross to c/okmatewanker
9 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Justas@sh.itjust.works 5 points 1 month ago

It also required so many soldiers to keep that anyone put in charge of Britannia could take the legions to march on Rome and would have a chance of becoming the new emperor.