this post was submitted on 24 Sep 2024
642 points (97.2% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2987 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Russian President Vladimir Putin has suffered an emabarassing setback as his feared Satan 2 nuclear arsenal failed four out of five missile tests, according to arms experts and satellite imagery from the launch site.

High-resolution satellite images of the launch pad at Russia's Plesetsk test site, where the RS-28 Sarmat intercontinental ballistic missile exploded, shows extensive damage.

A crater approximately 60 meters wide at the launch silo at the Plesetsk Cosmodrome in northern Russia, along with visible damage in the surrounding area that was not present in images taken earlier in the month.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

ok slightly unrelated but the satellite pictures have an insane resolution for having been taken from, you know, space

The pics

Just imagine what the government has if that's what's available commercially to the public

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 14 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (3 children)

We know from Trump's heedless shitposting that they can get the theoretical maximum resolution out of whatever aperture they have. For the US ones with the Hubble-clone mirrors that means not quite enough to recognise a face.

[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 8 points 2 months ago (1 children)

It's amazing that one person can do so much crazy shit even that's forgettable.

[–] MouseKeyboard@ttrpg.network 4 points 2 months ago

I bet no one remembers even a quarter of this list: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Racial_views_of_Donald_Trump

[–] yonder@sh.itjust.works 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Just gotta hope they are not pointing the thing at you...

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 2 months ago

I mean, it's hard to avoid any number of other, closer cameras.

[–] isolatedscotch@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)
[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

IMO it's one of the least worst forms of surveillance. Keyhole 69420 might be able to see you're outside, but the NSA sees everything you put in Google, especially the embarrassing things.

for one thing, it's mostly just lensing, and for another, it's also partially due to the atmosphere of the earth actually working in tandem with the lensing of the satellites themselves. Dont ask me how it works but from what i understand, seeing out from earth is harder, but seeing in from space is easy. Something to do with the way that light refraction in the atmosphere works or something.

the weirdest thing about telescopes (essentially what these are), is that you can just put a hole in them, and they'll still work just fine. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Harlan_J._Smith_Telescope#Vandalism_damage

[–] nutsack@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

i imagine a bit of that is a software trick