this post was submitted on 20 Sep 2024
413 points (94.8% liked)

Technology

58209 readers
3980 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each another!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, to ask if your bot can be added please contact us.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed

Approved Bots


founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] DontMakeMoreBabies@lemm.ee 180 points 3 days ago (3 children)

If a kid is smart enough to figure this out and make it work for them, they're gonna be fine...

[–] Maestro@fedia.io 88 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but the kids buying the modded devices may not be

[–] umbrella@lemmy.ml 25 points 3 days ago

good. they will learn not to buy their way out of a problem at least.

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 80 points 3 days ago (4 children)

Back when we were doing quadratic equations; I wrote a program on my TI-84 that would ask which parts of the equation you already had, and would fill in the rest for you.

My teacher liked it so much he bought a transfer cable for those calculators so he could get a copy for himself. Then used to to grade tests.

[–] Khanzarate@lemmy.world 44 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I did the same thing. It was allowed in general, with the correct thought, "if you can code it yourself, you know the content"

I had another "program" that would fail to run but that's because I wrote notes into it. Doubt that was allowed.

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 18 points 3 days ago (2 children)

Here in NZ they do a factory reset on your calculator at the start of every exam.

[–] piecat@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

Oh I would have been so pissed. I was programming on my calculator 24/7 instead of my classes.

I wrote a sudoku "editor"

I put that in quotes because I had a grid that could be navigated, arrows moved, storing the numbers, had number entry down. And when it was time to implement the solver, I learned the hard way what p vs np is.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 2 days ago (1 children)

They did that here too, but students would use a cheat program that made it look like teachers were resetting it, but really the memory was safe

[–] SomeoneSomewhere@lemmy.nz 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't remember if they fully closed the loopholes, but there are inputs that programs cannot catch unless you actually replace the OS.

[–] sem@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 14 hours ago

My memory is pretty hazy but the cheat application emulated the process that teachers used to do a system reset.

Iirc, it let you press menu, select reset, confirm, and showed the (fake) confirmation screen.

Also IIRC, you had to install it from Mirage OS, which I don't think was an OS (?) but rather an app that everyone had to play games from.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 2 points 3 days ago

I did that but made it return success before it got to the notes. You had to scroll to get to the notes, but it looked innocuous before that.

[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 17 points 3 days ago (2 children)

I could never remember the formula to calculate compound interest.

But I had no trouble writing a for loop.

[–] VintageGenious@sh.itjust.works 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)
[–] linearchaos@lemmy.world 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I would just rebuild something in my head like this every time.

While i < n; k=k+(k*r); i++;

You'd think I could remember k(1+r)^n but when you posted, it looked as alien as it felt decades ago.

The use of for makes sense.

k=0; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k+f(i); is the same as k=\sum_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

and

k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k=k*f(i); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} f(i)

In our case, f(i)=1+r and k=1; for (i=0; i<n; i++) k*(1+r); is the same as k=\prod_{i=0}^{n-1} (1+r) = (1+r)^n

All of that just to say that exponentiation is an iteration of multiplication, the same way that multiplication is an iteration of addition

[–] BluesF@lemmy.world 2 points 2 days ago

What always annoyed me was having to draw charts by hand. Just let me put the data in a computer for god's sake, the rest of the working is there... I did actually write a python function for one of my assignments which was fine, but they told me not to do it for the exam.

[–] TheEighthDoctor@lemmy.world 4 points 2 days ago

I made one to decompose polynomials it was very good because it showed all the steps it was literally just copy what's on the calc to the page

[–] ShunkW@lemmy.world -3 points 3 days ago (2 children)

So you didn't get the transfer cable with your calculator? Smells fishy

[–] Darkassassin07@lemmy.ca 11 points 3 days ago

Issued by the school; I never owned it.

[–] TriflingToad@lemmy.world 8 points 3 days ago (1 children)

you can code directly on the device, it's just a PAIN to do compared to moving the files over

[–] zalgotext@sh.itjust.works 1 points 2 days ago

Can confirm, as someone who spent multiple study halls trying to program a top down shooter on his calculator

[–] roofuskit@lemmy.world 8 points 2 days ago

As someone who was a kid who would do things like this to avoid putting in the work, no this kid will probably not be fine.