this post was submitted on 17 Sep 2024
83 points (85.5% liked)

Space

8478 readers
525 users here now

Share & discuss informative content on: Astrophysics, Cosmology, Space Exploration, Planetary Science and Astrobiology.


Rules

  1. Be respectful and inclusive.
  2. No harassment, hate speech, or trolling.
  3. Engage in constructive discussions.
  4. Share relevant content.
  5. Follow guidelines and moderators' instructions.
  6. Use appropriate language and tone.
  7. Report violations.
  8. Foster a continuous learning environment.

Picture of the Day

The Busy Center of the Lagoon Nebula


Related Communities

πŸ”­ Science

πŸš€ Engineering

🌌 Art and Photography


Other Cool Links

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 87 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (5 children)

Clickbaity title. The estimated time until Higgs field decay has been changed from 10^794^ years to 10^790^ years. Presumably there's some tiny chance of it happening today, but practically we can just continue worrying about all the regular stuff that is about to kill us all.

[–] somtwo@lemmy.world 50 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Also, from what I understand, we wouldn't see it coming (as the decay would be spreading at the speed of light), and everything would be over before our senses could ever detect anything out of the ordinary.

[–] Big_Boss_77@lemmynsfw.com 4 points 1 day ago

So, if I'm reading it right, everything would just rip apart at the speed of light due to a change in mass because of the Higgs field transitioning to a lower state?

[–] drspod@lemmy.ml 18 points 2 days ago (2 children)

That's a huge difference, the estimate became 10,000 times smaller.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 18 points 2 days ago (3 children)

It is, but there are still quite a lot of zeros left.

[–] pyre@lemmy.world 2 points 1 day ago

it's still a concern for biden

[–] henfredemars@infosec.pub 11 points 2 days ago

It’s like if I became 10,000 times less attractive. Same thing.

[–] thefartographer@lemm.ee 5 points 2 days ago

Is it more than 3?

[–] Shard@lemmy.world -5 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Its more like 0.5% difference.

Not really, the new value is 0.0001% of the old.

Just because the number has barely fewer digits doesn't mean it's barely smaller

[–] rtxn@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

Guess I'm not spending that Christmas with my family after all...

[–] expatriado@lemmy.world 5 points 2 days ago

we'll find out who was right then