this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
1309 points (97.6% liked)

Greentext

4508 readers
1903 users here now

This is a place to share greentexts and witness the confounding life of Anon. If you're new to the Greentext community, think of it as a sort of zoo with Anon as the main attraction.

Be warned:

If you find yourself getting angry (or god forbid, agreeing) with something Anon has said, you might be doing it wrong.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 22 points 2 months ago (3 children)

I would add scooping dog shit is another test. There are people out there who will bag the shit and then leave the bag on the ground for the poop to steam in for a few days before they put another bag right next to it to keep it company.

[–] ArbitraryValue@sh.itjust.works 10 points 2 months ago (3 children)

Why do people do that? I mean, if they intend to abandon the dog poop, why would they bag it first?

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 9 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Not defending this, but some people intend to pick up the bag on their return, presumably as they are headed away from a trashcan and will return to one on the way back. They don't want to carry it the whole time.

They should just carry it the whole time, or return to the start then and there to drop it

[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

some people intend to pick up the bag on their return

If that's the case and they don't forget, then I am firmly on their side. Literally no one is impacted if the bagged poo sits there another 30-60 minutes...

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 3 points 2 months ago

Generally agree, the issue is when they forget

[–] thesystemisdown@lemmy.world 6 points 2 months ago

Sometimes people walking dogs plan on walking past the same spot on the return trip, so they leave the bag. Sometimes they forget to pick it back up, or forget that they dropped it there and take a different route home. Sometimes bag number two is the next day, or some other person's bag. Generally, if someone's going to pull a shit and split, they're not bagging.

[–] DrDickHandler@lemmy.world 2 points 2 months ago

Don't waste your time trying to analyze the decision making of an animal.

[–] Rhaedas@fedia.io 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

Which is worse, the ones that leave a bag (perhaps unintentionally) or the ones that just don't bother with the responsibility at all? When I had a dog I not only would clean up behind him, I would leave the bag untied until the end to capture what I could of the inevitable left piles I would run across. I'm sure cart return, dog poop, fast food containers, and the old cigarette butts are all under some human psychology grouping of ego superiority.

[–] SmoothLiquidation@lemmy.world 8 points 2 months ago

I think leaving the bag is worse. When it is just poop, maybe the dog ran out of sight or was loose or the walker ran out of bags or whatever. When it is bagged, a human made a decision to scoop it and then leave it on purpose.

Both are bad but bagged shows intention.

[–] anothercatgirl@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 2 months ago

Environmentally, the bag actually prevents biodegradation. If you don't pick up your dog poo in the wilderness and not where people step, some shit-eating insect (like roley-poley or cockroach or a worm) will eat it all up within a week.