this post was submitted on 04 Sep 2024
110 points (97.4% liked)

games

20609 readers
395 users here now

Tabletop, DnD, board games, and minecraft. Also Animal Crossing.

Rules

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
Nakoichi@hexbear.net
MiraculousMM@hexbear.net
ZoomeristLeninist@hexbear.net
jack@hexbear.net
Yor@hexbear.net
gaystyleJoker@hexbear.net
Sulvor@hexbear.net
110
Games already looked good enough 5 years ago (hexbear.net)
submitted 3 months ago by doublepepperoni@hexbear.net to c/games@hexbear.net
67 comments fedilink hide all child comments
 

Control and Resident Evil 2 Remake still look incredible and run well on fairly inexpensive hardware today. We don't need globally illuminated Unreal Engine 5 games with individually modeled nostril hairs on each character that require graphics cards with prices in the three digit range

Graphics should just be kept at late PS4 level for the foreseeable future to keep games as accessible as possible

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[โ€“] Gorb@hexbear.net 11 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Graphics can be good while also being well optimised but the issue here is a big commercial engine like unreal is designed to cut labour hours not run well. Crapitalism.

Most new graphics technologies could with clever application be used to enhance a game however it may be that it's used to cut dev time. For example:

  • upscaling and framegen to avoid the optimisation pass towards the end of development
  • raytracing to avoid carefully designed baked lightmaps
  • nanite to avoid making LOD's, nanite isn't magic it has its own major issues
  • software rtgi also is a cheap way to avoid just using decent baked lights and it ue5 looks awful with so much artifacting
  • automatic terrain generation to ynow

The effects aren't really intended to elevate the game but to reduce the cost of labour making them. An engine that both looks good and performs well takes a very long time to develop but instead you get the fuzzy ue5 mess where every game looks the same and runs terribly with perpetual stutter

[โ€“] Ericthescruffy@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

raytracing to avoid carefully designed baked lightmaps

There's some truth to your post but I gotta push back a bit on this one. Raytracing isn't so much a way to avoid having to generate lightmaps or cut costs so much as it is just an objectively superior option to lightmaps in terms of quality. In fact I would argue that Raytracing is maybe the singular reason games didn't quite look good enough 5 years ago. Polycounts aside Raytracing is basically the number one thing that's separated graphics in engine from prerendered cinematics that always seem to have that extra oomf. Lightmaps are largely generated by the computer anyway and even with raytracing both require an artist's labor to light the scene. The only downside and why you'd ever opt for lightmaps over raytracing is performance cause rendering real time reflections at 120fps in 4k is expensive.