UK Nature and Environment

391 readers

61 users here now

General Instance Rules:

No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia or xenophobia.
No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.
No harassment, dogpiling or doxxing of other users.
Do not share intentionally false or misleading information.
Do not spam or abuse network features.

Community Specific Rules:

Keep posts UK-specific. There are other places on Lemmy to post articles which relate to global environmental issues (e.g. slrpnk.net).
Keep comments in English so that they can be appropriately moderated.

Note: Our temporary logo is from The Wildlife Trusts. We are not officially associated with them.

Our autumn banner is a shot of maple leaves by Hossenfeffer.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

Kim

GreyShuck

Government to end badger cull within five years in ‘watershed moment’ (www.standard.co.uk)

submitted 2 months ago by Mex to c/nature

6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Why does it take 5 years to stop killing badgers?

[–] Mex 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

🤷Just glad somethign is happening.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 1 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I assume there is an alternative solution to TB spread, which takes some time to set up. Also, perhaps if you've contracted and legislated that culling is take place you can't easily revert that.

[–] WeirdGoesPro@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 2 months ago (1 children)

230,000 badgers have been pointlessly killed in the cull since 2013, despite Government data which found no evidence that culling badgers has had an effect on eliminating tuberculosis in cattle.

The government says the cull has no effect on bovine TB. Seems like killing thousands more animals for the sake of fulfilling a contract is kinda shitty, in my opinion.

[–] Luvs2Spuj@lemmy.world 0 points 2 months ago

Perhaps, but overall it's a more positive step than continuing indefinitely.

I was only speculating about why, I have no more information available than you. It could be for blood sport, but I think that is far less likely.

The debate around whether or not it has any effects is also fuelled by flawed conclusions on either side of the argument, I'm not wading into that mess...