this post was submitted on 30 Aug 2024
827 points (98.4% liked)

linuxmemes

21263 readers
1035 users here now

Hint: :q!

Sister communities:

Community rules (click to expand)

1. Follow the site-wide rules

2. Be civil
  • Understand the difference between a joke and an insult.
  • Do not harrass or attack members of the community for any reason.
  • Leave remarks of "peasantry" to the PCMR community. If you dislike an OS/service/application, attack the thing you dislike, not the individuals who use it. Some people may not have a choice.
  • Bigotry will not be tolerated.
  • These rules are somewhat loosened when the subject is a public figure. Still, do not attack their person or incite harrassment.
    • 3. Post Linux-related content
  • Including Unix and BSD.
  • Non-Linux content is acceptable as long as it makes a reference to Linux. For example, the poorly made mockery of sudo in Windows.
  • No porn. Even if you watch it on a Linux machine.
    • 4. No recent reposts
  • Everybody uses Arch btw, can't quit Vim, and wants to interject for a moment. You can stop now.

    • Please report posts and comments that break these rules!

    founded 1 year ago
    MODERATORS
    poopsmith@lemmy.world
    zephyr@lemmy.world
    rtxn@lemmy.world
    827
    Activate Linux (lemmy.zip)
    submitted 2 months ago by Maven@lemmy.zip to c/linuxmemes@lemmy.world
    80 comments fedilink hide all child comments
     

    cross-posted from: https://lemmy.zip/post/21851456

    you are viewing a single comment's thread
    view the rest of the comments
    [โ€“] boredsquirrel@slrpnk.net 4 points 2 months ago (1 children)

    Example?

    Podman, virt-manager, toolbx, tuned are the software I know. I could agree on a few that redoing some is bad

    [โ€“] BarbecueCowboy@lemmy.world 3 points 2 months ago

    Fucking podman... Oh man. I have lost way too many hours dealing with podman.

    It's frustrating, because they've put so much into it. It's close enough that vendors think they can get away with saying their containers are compatible and they've probably really honestly tested for brief periods and it really usually is close enough that you don't discover the differences until you're already very well established, but then it's just a little different and it takes you FOREVER to find out why but then the only option once you do find that out is to completely start over from scratch with docker. And, almost no vendor is going to treat them differently because if we talk to redhat, the first note we'll get back is that everything we're trying to do should be fully compatible and there should be no need to worry about that. And, then eventually after a few weeks, it's docker's fault that IT WORKS IN DOCKER AND NOT IN PODMAN. Docker needs to go fix it so it's broken for them too, it's not a bug for podman, the problem is with the one that's working.

    I'm a bit traumatized, not always the same, but this isn't a singular occurrence.