this post was submitted on 27 Aug 2024
86 points (87.7% liked)

The Deprogram Podcast

825 readers
3 users here now

International Anti-Capitalist podcast run by an American, Slav and an Arab.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 13 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Gaza was the Israeli response to Hamas militants (democratically supported by the people of Gaza) breaching Israeli defenses, attacking military bases, then seizing Israeli civilians as hostages.

Does Palestinian or Hamas violence justify the collateral killing of over 30,000 Palestinians and the likely famine-induced death of over 180,000 people? After all, the Gaza government’s attack suggests they’re no longer civilians. I think the answer is no.

I mean these things arent comparable, I dont think anyone would argue against the IOF considering the hamas fighters to be valid combat targets when they started killing people. Like we can disagree with the ideology of the IOF while still recongising they had some cassius bell to open fire on armed combatents.

No it doesnt, but it isnt relevant to what we're discussing. If hamas won the war, then a splinter group of hamas fighters started killing Palestine police officers who are unarmed id have more of an issue with it.

[–] farmer_of_song@lemmygrad.ml -4 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

As Communists, do we really have to obsess over blood-for-blood violence? Applying this to the Brits justifies the complete genocide of the British people, given the starvation that occurred in India during colonialism.

I'm currently in China. Defending the party goes as far as saying "if the Party had a secure way to avoid civilian deaths without compromising the Revolution, it would have done so, but it had no choice. The loss of life is truly regrettable, on both sides." We don't need to say the protesters deserved it (although Chai Ling probably did, but she got out without a scratch.)

[–] ghost_of_faso2@lemmygrad.ml 9 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) (1 children)

The loss of life is truly regrettable, on both sides.” We don’t need to say the protesters deserved it (although Chai Ling probably did, but she got out without a scratch.)

Thats a good way to put it honestly, but yeah I wouldnt go as far as to say 'they deseved it' but more, what did they expect to happen?

You lynch a police officer who didnt have a gun you better expect the military to get involved, where is the sympathy for the dead civil servants who where making good faith attempts at peacefully de-escelating the situation?

As Communists, do we really have to obsess over blood-for-blood violence? Applying this to the Brits justifies the complete genocide of the British people, given the starvation that occurred in India during colonialism.

Im really not obsessed over it, just if in a communist state you have rioters killing people 'die by the sword' starts to become a reality, you cant take a life and expect a peacefull response by any state. Personal accountability for the protestors exists as much as it did for the state in this situation.