349
St. Louis police have failed to solve nearly 60% of homicides committed since 2017
(news.stlpublicradio.org)
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
349 points (99.2% liked)
News
22896 readers
4420 users here now
Welcome to the News community!
Rules:
1. Be civil
Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.
Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. We have an actively updated blocklist, which you can see here: https://lemmy.world/post/2246130 if you feel like any website is missing, contact the mods. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.
3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.
Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.
4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.
Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.
5. Only recent news is allowed.
Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.
6. All posts must be news articles.
No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.
7. No duplicate posts.
If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.
8. Misinformation is prohibited.
Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.
9. No link shorteners.
The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.
10. Don't copy entire article in your post body
For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
My guy, I'm not sure that you read either link despite quoting them. You skipped over #5, huh? Or #6, that despite a surge the murder rate is still below previous highs? Hell, they even say that outright in #7.
You're right that I didn't specifically link the second article to discuss underreported deaths. I did it because Figure 2 shows NVSS data that I could not otherwise locate easily, which also shows the trend I suggested. It can be difficult, I'm sure for reasons you understand, to source figures for police violence from rigorous sources.... Especially when, as the article I linked notes, there are numerous issues with official sources. Here's UIC's page anyway, though.
But sure, yeah, thanks for your helpful illumination.
I actually didn't! #5 - "Annual government surveys from the Bureau of Justice Statistics show no recent increase in the U.S. violent crime rate." If you wanted me to look and note how this is not at all your claim, I'll do it. I just thought it was redundant. So that proves your statement false again.
#6 - Is an estimate based on a survey that they claim showed no increase. Once again, against what you said of decreasing. Here's a useful quote for you: "It relies on data voluntarily submitted by thousands of local police departments, but many law enforcement agencies do not participate. In the latest FBI study, around four-in-ten police departments"
Your argument of violent crime going down is incorrect based on this survey taken of police departments that only really 40% shared. I don't think that's the smoking gun you want, especially because it'd be friendly fire.
#7 - if you have an issue with what I quoted, please show me what goes against my argument, and for yours.
Regarding the second link, I understand, I hate when I am looking for something specific, that should be easy to find (I also looked up homicides by police over years and couldn't find much) - but I still, it does look like rates, specifically over the last 5 years have been on an upward tend. That's worrying, I'm curious the analysis on this.
I see you do not understand that by "down," I am speaking historically and not arbitrarily "in the last three years." The graph with #5 goes back to 1993. The downward trend is clear. I'm not sure if you're being pedantic or deliberately obtuse.
Besides which, the claim of "insane violent crime rates" is your contention, and you have provided no definition or source for this notion.
I don't feel the need to keep engaging with you on this subject. You seem to take pride in missing the forest for the trees. Have a nice night.
Oh, so you're comparing this last year to...what? You need some sort of finite time period, no? Or are you comparing rates to as long as humanity existed? To be fair, adam and eve, there was no violent crimes. First one was Cain and Able, so you'd be wrong in that instance too.
Well if you're using that as your gauge, then police killings are also down, see figure 3, the same figure you refereed me to before. Which is it? Do you want to compare police killings from 2015 to now and violent crime rates over the last 100 years? That doesn't make sense, it seems like you're the one arbitrarily choosing time periods.
You're the one comparing these two, you gotta be consistent. You can't change your metrics simply because you don't like they way they turn out.
That's a bummer, our last messages we were a bit closer to understanding, but then this message it seemed you lost all direction of your argument. Or maybe because you realized that you were arguing a point that contradicts itself if you have to be consistent.