this post was submitted on 30 Jul 2024
348 points (98.9% liked)

politics

19089 readers
5561 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Guntrigger@sopuli.xyz 135 points 3 months ago (11 children)

Whenever I see some moronic term like "Stop Woke" it just translates in my mind to "Stop Education".

I know these guys are trying to morph "woke" into some negative term, usually with some racially charged undertones, but it will always be synonymous with "englightened" to me.

Are they genuinely trying to stifle education, or is it all just racist bullshit?

[–] partial_accumen@lemmy.world 50 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Whenever I see some moronic term like “Stop Woke” it just translates in my mind to “Stop Education”.

Not so fun fact:

It is popularly known in Nigerian and Western media as “Boko Haram,” which means “Western education is forbidden” (the word boko is a holdover from the colonial English word for book).

Too many similarities between these guys and republicans these days.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 37 points 3 months ago (4 children)
[–] Hazzia@infosec.pub 15 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

Man I tried to get more cultured by reading 1001 Nights and boy lemme tell you I couldn't even make it that far because it was literally a whole buncha (muslim-coded, not the main concern here) incel manosphere bullshit but written in the middle east however long ago. Legit there was one story about how a lady was cheating on a djinn who kidnapped her while he slept and the message was "man, if bitches cheat on BIG, STRONG men like him, bitches will cheat on anybody" This comes after one of the characters (a king) finds out that his wife was having orgys with all his "large-membered, intellectually-inferior, dark-skinned servants" (paraphrasing). There was another story about how it's a man's moral obligation to beat his wife. Apparently every incel talking points including "BBC" is at least as old as that damn book.

[–] Klear@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Makes sense venn you put it like that.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Well both of them are Abrahamic cults.

[–] Viking_Hippie@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yup! I have one for that too:

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 3 points 3 months ago

Same god, similar bullshit.

[–] BossDj@lemm.ee 5 points 3 months ago

Pro terrorism

Antiprogress

Making the wealthy even wealthier

Raping children

Picking and choosing which scripture to believe

Making up lies that aren't in the scripture

Being hypocrites

[–] seaQueue@lemmy.world 14 points 3 months ago

You don't want your state governed by Talibangelicals and Y'all Qaeda?

[–] Mostly_Gristle@lemmy.world 24 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Are they genuinely trying to stifle education, or is it all just racist bullshit?

That's the fun part: stifling education is the racist bullshit.

They've been anti-education since desegregation. Back in the '60s the Religious Right, particularly Oral Roberts, Jerry Falwell, and the people in that orbit, tried really hard to go through the courts and use their freedom of religion under the First Amendment to keep black people out of their church-based schools. Obviously they lost, but they have never forgotten how the mean ol' federal government defiled their perfect little angels by forcing them sit next to some filthy negro while they learn their multiplication tables or whatever. Ever since then they've made it their mission to destroy public education.

By the 1980s that Evangelical movement had become fully ingrained into the Republican party, and that drive to destroy public education came with it. It's what's behind the push for charter schools. It's what's behind the push for private school vouchers. It's what's behind Evangelicals astroturfing school board meetings, and sometimes taking over the school board itself. It's a big part of why public schools (inner city public schools in particular) have been chronically underfunded for longer than I've been alive. It was racism the whole time.

But yeah, whenever I hear a conservative use the word "woke," I've found you can pretty much always mentally transpose "woke" with "ni--er stuff" (or "fa--ot stuff," depending on the context) and whatever they're trying to say suddenly makes a lot more sense.

[–] MojoMcJojo@lemmy.world 8 points 3 months ago

Here in Florida that's exactly what's happening. Mother's of liberty bully the school boards and administrators and teachers and take over at the ground level like PTA's. The charter schools get to be selective on who can attend and suddenly a town that's 10% non-white has a charter schools that are 99% white and is better funded than the public school. Charter schools are a work around for segregation. Also no teachers union in Charter schools, so toe the line or be fired. Now, with better funding and support from the good 'ol boy local politicians the Charter school is the only A rated in school in the district so everyone thinks charter schools are better and wants to get their kids in there. They're setting the stage for a 2nd civil rights movement but they do not intend on losing again. Fuck! I hate racists.

[–] WhyDoYouPersist@lemmy.world 18 points 3 months ago (1 children)

It definitely, directly benefits them to choke out education for American citizens. They do not want critical thought. That is bad for bottom lines.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 12 points 3 months ago

They want: Obedient. Workers. Obedient. Workers....

[–] anomoly_@lemmy.world 9 points 3 months ago

It isn't just affecting education, unfortunately. There's a number of topics (e.g. human rights, equality, etc) that society has become more enlightened about and that they'd like to revert.

[–] JustZ@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Attacks on "woke" are attacks on civil rights. It's a way to undermine anyone who might stand up for "others."

I used to hear this joke "the first thing we do is kill all the lawyers." Like, haha, lawyers suck. But it's really a playbook for fascism: get rid of the people who might defend the othrrs. Not funny at all.

[–] CharlesDarwin@lemmy.world 6 points 3 months ago

Are they genuinely trying to stifle education, or is it all just racist bullshit?

Could be a bit of both.

[–] samus12345@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago

I know these guys are trying to morph “woke” into some negative term, usually with some racially charged undertones, but it will always be synonymous with “englightened” to me.

Because that's pretty much what it means, social enlightenment. They hate enlightenment.

[–] frog_brawler@lemmy.world 5 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

They’ve been giving funding intended to go to public schools to charter schools for a while now. The intent is to make public schools so bad that parents will be forced to either pay for expensive (religious) private schools, or to send their kids to charter schools which aren’t openly religious, but allow for “some religion” when it’s reflective of the population of the school community itself.

It religiously indoctrinates, and segregates communities at the same time. It’s by design. They don’t want a class war if they can perpetuate culture wars. Religious people are less likely to question authority. Dumb people are less likely to question authority. Uninformed people that have never met a person from “X” background are more likely to perpetuate culture war nonsense.

[–] orcrist@lemm.ee 4 points 3 months ago

Yes, they know that educated people don't respect them. Their power depends on ignorance, which includes discrimination.

Some of them probably also believe many of the horrible or obviously false things they say. If you're narcissistic enough, it's not exactly lying. Everything you say is wishful thinking, and you can't tell the difference between that and reality.

[–] Fuzzy_Red_Panda@lemm.ee 3 points 3 months ago

it will always be synonymous with "englightened" to me.

I love it. Personally, I change 'woke' to 'being a decent human being', and it really highlights how batshit crazy and awful the speaker really is.