this post was submitted on 15 Jul 2024
145 points (98.0% liked)

chapotraphouse

13452 readers
729 users here now

Banned? DM Wmill to appeal.

No anti-nautilism posts. See: Eco-fascism Primer

Vaush posts go in the_dunk_tank

Dunk posts in general go in the_dunk_tank, not here

Don't post low-hanging fruit here after it gets removed from the_dunk_tank

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] radio_free_asgarthr@hexbear.net 28 points 2 months ago (2 children)

Love the rhetoric simultaneously being that Trump is a would be dictator that will end democracy and institute fascism, but we can't be as impolite or hostile as to oppose him.

[–] Rom@hexbear.net 21 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (1 children)

He's an existential threat and would be the downfall of the US, but god forbid someone try to take him out.

[–] cmhickman358@hexbear.net 10 points 2 months ago

"If I had a time machine, I would go back and make baby Hitler to read 'It Takes a Village' by Hillary Clinton and then he wouldn't start WWII"

[–] TemutheeChallahmet@hexbear.net 3 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

The thing is, Dems know if they put up a remorseless, possibly effective fight it would change the character of the party, and probably amp up some violence from Trump supporters, and they themselves are too afraid of being the ones to actively stoke any anger from the other side head first. Even when the sole choices are either they back down, Trump wins and there's permanent state violence, or they stand tall, beat back Trump's advancement and there's short-term random violence from his supporters, they will always go with the option that is most passive because that is their fixed and immovable disposition.