this post was submitted on 07 Jul 2024
1185 points (99.3% liked)

World News

39142 readers
4681 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Veraxus@lemmy.world 105 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Alright! Now if France and Britain’s new left-of-center leadership can just… PLEASE not fuck it up… there may actually hope for the rest of the planet.

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 55 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Britain left of centre ? . . . these are blairites, "labour" in name only , they literally propped up the second homes buy to let market through the 2000s. and they'd gladly privatise every public service we have left if they can. I've already heard shit like "individualised healthcare" being mentioned in their "think tanks".

They're probably not worse than the tories, and they probably will fuck it up less, that's about all you can hope for them.

They aren't going to tackle anything fundamental like bank regulation, promoting domestic investment, industrial strategy or developing public services.

I hope France gets a lot better.

[–] EnderMB@lemmy.world 12 points 4 months ago (2 children)

100% agreed. Weirdly, Starmer was very left-leaning during his time as a prosecutor, and a lot of people assumed that he'd be a rising force of the left when he moved into politics. Sadly, he seems closer to the right than even Blair did...

[–] PrettyFlyForAFatGuy 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

to be determined in my opinion. he's been in office two days atm.

give him a chance

[–] oo1@lemmings.world 14 points 4 months ago

My opinion is pretty much based on their manifesto. I don't see how they can do anything progressive when their mandate is based on that bag of shite.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

It's a a democracy, representatives aren't supposed to impose what they want onto the people. They're supposed to represent what the people want. It's likely Starmer is still more left leaning than the consensus of the public. But his job isn't to impose his will on the people but to do what the people want.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 9 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

And according the abysmal turnout and the fact that starmer's labour couldn't even really outcompete Corbyn's in the popular vote despite the collapse of the Tories, the people naturally want a watered down version of the Tory austerity platform and enlightened centrism?

If there's one thing the UK election will show you, the people want someone to fucking do something about their cost of living problems, not play middle of the road and keep the status quo. They go to the far right because of that.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Politics is about compromise to be a best fit to the will of the people. Starmer is a better fit to the overall will of the people in the UK. Corbyn might have been a better fit to what the left wanted, but are you really claiming he was closer to the overall will of all of the people of the UK than Starmer is?

Democracy is about following the will of the people, not imposing your will upon the people.

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Considering he got 40 percent in one of his elections and Starmer didn't even get 35 percent in this one, yeah I guess I am.

At least I have a metric I'm pointing to when I'm saying what the consensus is, instead of generally pulling it out of my ass.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Fuck the metrics, Starmer is PM and Corbyn is just an independent nobody that will effect zero positive change.

But talking big and doing nothing is what socialism is all about these days, isn't it?

[–] roguetrick@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah yes, let's thank Starmer for his electoral coup of getting Farage to collapse the Tories while being unable to increase labour's vote share. He's a real dooer.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 months ago

Starmer is PM and Corbyn lost to Boris Johnson. Can't change the facts no matter how much it hurts.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

They’re supposed to represent what the people want

They are supposed to listen to their constituents and do whats best for them.

Sometimes that means not giving them what they want, cause the average person is a fucking moron.. and half of them are dumber than that.

Great example would be Brexit.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

But who's really the moron here? People that don't like people that call them morons, or socialists who say they're for the working class, need the support of the working class for their movement to succeed, but publicly call the people they need support from "fucking morons"?

Trump also says similar things about people whose support he needs BTW.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Yes yes the "b-b-both sides!" false equivalency again. Thats totally not tried and tired.

[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You sound basically the same, but if you're wrapping yourself in the red flags of failure while Trump is wrapping himself in the American flag, why would you think someone would even bother to hear you out?

You can't win over the working class because modern socialism doesn't care about being appealing to the working class. It's entirely focused on being holier than thou towards liberals which accomplishes less than nothing. Net negative effect on society in real terms.

[–] A_Random_Idiot@lemmy.world 0 points 4 months ago (1 children)
[–] SpaceCowboy@lemmy.ca -2 points 4 months ago

Thanks, sweetie.

[–] Aceticon@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

Yeah, by European standards, I don't think New Labour are even just Center-Right: they have far too much love for "businesses", privatisation and deregulation to be an inch left of the traditional Right - in many ways they're pretty much were the Tories were back in Thatcher's day.

[–] cley_faye@lemmy.world 5 points 4 months ago

This was not a vote for leadership. It was a vote for one of our houses. Unless the president decides to play nice (spoiler: he won't), we won't have a prime minister from any left party, causing things to be difficult for the right but not impossible, as there are provision to force some laws to pass for the prime minister, and outright impossible for the left to do anything because they're unlikely to get support from a right-oriented prime minister, and are unlikely to get an actual majority vote on anything.

Basically, unless something really unexpected happens, this will result in a stalemate for a while. Which is, admittedly, the lesser of two evils, but kinda sucks anyway.