this post was submitted on 04 Jul 2024
163 points (98.8% liked)

UK Politics

3103 readers
414 users here now

General Discussion for politics in the UK.
Please don't post to both !uk_politics@feddit.uk and !unitedkingdom@feddit.uk .
Pick the most appropriate, and put it there.

Posts should be related to UK-centric politics, and should be either a link to a reputable news source for news, or a text post on this community.

Opinion pieces are also allowed, provided they are not misleading/misrepresented/drivel, and have proper sources.

If you think "reputable news source" needs some definition, by all means start a meta thread. (These things should be publicly discussed)

Posts should be manually submitted, not by bot. Link titles should not be editorialised.

Disappointing comments will generally be left to fester in ratio, outright horrible comments will be removed.
Message the mods if you feel something really should be removed, or if a user seems to have a pattern of awful comments.

!ukpolitics@lemm.ee appears to have vanished! We can still see cached content from this link, but goodbye I guess! :'(

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
163
submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by Emperor to c/uk_politics
 

It's time to see if the polls are right.

Previously: the voting megathread

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] HumanPenguin 4 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (1 children)

Given, many systems require more than just marking one box. While, even those that do not, would drastically change how people choose their vote.

I am unsure any such site can give a realistic result from available data?

Edit:

If we just assume proportional based on % of vote yesterday.

Tor 22.9% Lab 35.2% LDe 11.3% Ref 14.5% SNP 2.5% Oth 13.6%

It is bloody hard to see how either party could form a viable 50% Lab LD SNP and a few independents would take it over 50. But honestly, it is hard to imagine that working with the politicians voted yesterday. Tory Ref would need all independents. So less likely to work.

But as I said. Voters would go to the polls with very different ideas about how to vote.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 3 points 4 months ago (2 children)

Tory Ref would need all independents

"Other" is not all independents. 6.8% of the vote share was Green, and 0.8% is between Workers Party and Social Democratic Party who, based purely on the names, I cannot possibly imagine would ever back the Conservatives. Unless LibDems were to support that coalition (which, after the 2010 Government I cannot imagine they'd be super keen on), there is no path to a Tory Government from these results under a proportional system. Labour can form a Government with just LibDem, SNP, and Green parties.

[–] HonoraryMancunian@lemmy.world 3 points 4 months ago

Exactly, total up left(ish) votes and you get about 54% ✊️

[–] HumanPenguin 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

An independent (SNP) and unionist (Labour) party would be hard-pressed to form a government.

But again the whole idea of the votes being identicle under a vastyyly different system

Honestly the big question would be how government is formed. With seat numbers matching % of vote. under our current system. Labour could run a weak gov by depending on greens snp and others never supporting a tor ref vonc.

But with centre right lab, it is likely only ld and lab would be garmented to support most policy votes. Others, often refusing because it's not left enough and not right enough at the same time.

Unfortunately, while the right has clasped over this election. The right has a long history of unity to fight the left.

the left much the opposite in fighting the right.

[–] Zagorath@aussie.zone 1 points 4 months ago (2 children)

An independent (SNP) and unionist (Labour) party would be hard-pressed to form a government.

Would they? Outside of the question of independence, the two parties agree on more than not, don't they? If they alternative is no functioning government, couldn't you see Labour giving some minor concession to the SNP (like maybe allowing Holyrood to have power over one or two of the things that was recently denied by the Supreme Court) in exchange for the SNP's support in Confidence?

the big question would be how government is formed

I'm not really sure what you mean. (It doesn't help that the rest of that paragraph is ridden by typos to the point of being unintelligible. Sorry.) Government would be formed the same way they do it in Germany or New Zealand or any of the many other countries with proportional systems. They would find a way to reach a majority by agreeing on whatever compromises are palatable to both sides. In a hypothetical where the SNP had way more seats, Labour might have to agree to a second independence referendum. If they really needed Green support they might agree to pass strong climate legislation. They might have to give the LibDems a couple of significant cabinet positions. Proportional systems force politicians to actually do politics and pass legislation that is supported by a majority of people, instead of giving a single party a majority of seats based on a minority of people supporting them.

[–] Noel_Skum@sh.itjust.works 2 points 4 months ago

Your final sentence is painfully true.

[–] HumanPenguin 1 points 4 months ago

Would they?

SNPs manifesto included it as a key point. So actual coalition government. Well look at how lib dems got hit over student fees. SNP voters would feel the same having voted for an independence party.

Hence why labour have faced the question at all past elections where a win os less probable amd denied they would form such a coalition.

But as said. A confodence amd supply agreement where snp agree to non confidence votes. Is probable on such situs.