zzpza

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
 

Post from when it was lost: https://feddit.uk/post/935755

[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I've been at the thick end of this fight for over a decade (on reddit). The vast majority of the work I and my co-mods do is never seen by anyone outside the mod team.

If it’s an agenda that goes against what people generally think, don’t they get down voted?

It depends. Very few are stupid enough to say anything that's obviously bad. Most use dog whistles and innuendo. And when they do speak plainly, there's an army of their likeminded friends to drown out any descenting voices (brigading) and inflate their (and similar) comments.

That sounds like their own communities? Those are easy to spot and back away from. If it’s just a group of individuals whose agenda goes against the grain, those “discussions, posts, subjects” are either controversial to begin with or they aren’t of enough significance to make a difference anyway. Where it matters, wouldn’t they be overwhelmingly down voted?

Yes, bad actors can have their own community. No, you don't want to go there. Did you ever see /r/MGTOW, or /r/PussyPassDenied? Mysogony is rife, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia, racism, etc, etc are all more common than they used to be 5-10 years ago.

I’m not aware of having seen this when it hasn’t been dealt with be mods/admins, usually by locking the post or deleting the comment and with bans. Where you see damage being done through the post having quickly turned toxic, I see the moderation that follows as a red flag.

If a mod is any good, and knows the group the bad actors are from, then the majority of the work is done behind closed doors (automod for dog whistles and known phrases, etc).

Bans are seen as a "badge of honor" by most of these people since it's so easy to create a new account. They can also wait to appealed after 3 months since that's how far back the moderation log goes (on reddit), so unless you've kept notes and evidence it's easy for them to play the fool and say they've "turned over a new leaf".

This doesn't even touch on suspected state actors / state run bot accounts. Several UK regional subreddits saw a wave of anti-Ukranian posts (false news reports about robbery, attacks, theft, etc by refugees) in an attempt to destabilise the UK's support for Ukraine shortly after the Russian invasion.

Or the "bad news" accounts that just go from regional subreddit to subreddit posting (legitimate) news stories about bad things. Rape, murder, assault. Anything that can stir up some rage. They never comment, and post at all hours of the day, every day of the week.

[–] zzpza 3 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In my experience, if bad actors have a specific agenda to push they usually hang around in groups of likeminded people and search for specific discussions, posts, subjects, etc to push their agenda in. This can often results in a toxic / bad faith comment being one of, if not the most highly upvoted comments (due to brigading). Most people that take the middle ground on a topic rarely have the energy to fight against a dog pile of downvotes and bad actors. Automatically assuming that bad actors are single outliers operating by themselves is a bad position that IMHO leads to "too little, too late" moderation reactions after the damage is done and the post has turned toxic.

This is a very complex topic, and not one I believe can be solved by just letting the voting system work it out. I don't know the right answer, it's one I've been searching for, for years. But the assumption of "good faith, until proven otherwise" in conjunction with "it's only a few bad actors" is specifically the mentality the bad actors are exploiting. IMHO, YMMV, IANAL, etc...

[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Did you see the "Devil's Cauldron"? It is worth a look, especially if it's been raining hard.

 

A quartz surface – possibly laid deliberately to enhance the setting of a double stone row – has been uncovered during excavations at Piles Hill.

 

Dartmoor National Park Authority has agreed to respond to a new application seeking to appeal the Court of Appeal’s judgment which allowed backpack camping on some of Dartmoor’s commons without landowner permission.

[–] zzpza 83 points 1 year ago (9 children)

If only someone had said something beforehand...

/s

[–] zzpza 1 points 1 year ago

Sadly, yes. Real shame too, it used to be nice.

[–] zzpza 1 points 1 year ago
[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago

A lot can be said for light bikes. Having helped a friend pick up his CB500X covered in luggage when he dropped it at slow speed on gravel, I really don't want a heavy bike. My 401 is 150kg, and feels really light and nimble.

[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago

That would be so much better. Or I need to move to Scotland. One of the two!

[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago

Cool, was the first time for me a few weeks ago. Naturally I went on a Tuesday... when the cafe was shut to non-residents. So I turned around and went back over the pass the other way too.

[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Hi mate :D

Yeah, I'm thinking I might hire a van next time. It's two long boring days for me (don't have a mile muncher bike), mostly on the motorway to get up there. Which is high risk in itself since that's when mistakes are likely.

[–] zzpza 2 points 1 year ago

I did mean to do Orkney too, but since I could only get 1 week off work and not two I had to cut it from this trip. Next time :)

[–] zzpza 3 points 1 year ago

You see, you see what he's like? He winds me up, man, there's no reasoning with him!

view more: next ›