zaviex

joined 11 months ago
[–] zaviex@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

It’s performing 5-7% better for 30% less battery life while a similarly priced, slightly more expensive 14 inch MacBook has much better cooling and better features with even more battery life. This doesn’t solve a problem it makes the air a worse product by lowering battery. The air is for nothing more than light work. I can’t imagine anyone who wants one of those would say “yes I’d rather have 30% less battery life for 5% more performance and 1 C cooler on the chassis”.

[–] zaviex@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Did anyone read the article? The Uk never actually considered this they believe it was proposed by Abramovich himself or Israel

[–] zaviex@alien.top 1 points 9 months ago

No it isn’t, it’s done like that because it’s not meant to be used that way and it’s meant to be lighter and slimmer. His solution didn’t work, and while it probably could, why would Apple add this when it adds points of failure to a device that doesn’t need it