nintendiator

joined 1 year ago
 

As the link details, this is a project by Google to add a system not only to web clients, but also to web servers, that performs Device Attestation so that the website can control how, and if, a web browser or a machine in general can visit it.

As expected from Google, this is basically a combination of DRM and Anti-Adblock. They try to sell it as a way to """"only"""" perform nonidentifying checks, but in the same document in their section of open issues they leave to the air how to prevent their users (websites) from using it to discriminate web browsers that don't complain with certain criteria (such as "be Google Chrome").

There are various Issues opened already to let these people know the evil they are creating. One notable is here (28), and this social media thread follows the more general issue.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I seem to remember something like that was discussed at some point in Signal Community and one of the big arguments contra was that the normies and even some advanced people who use Signal just don't "get" UX warnings any more: you could have put all the red tabs, cross signs and unlocked padlocks on the screen you wanted, they were still gonna complain openly on the internet and discredit Signal for not actually "securing muh messages". It's actually part of the same argument why they don't let you export your own messages.

Besides, having to use the same engine (tab and all) in the same app for two things with vastly different reaches of security was murder on the dev team. There were things they were not able to keep testing because of clashing against SMS compat. It is one of the reasons why I think the smart thing to have done would have to keep the "original" app as the Signal SMS.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dropping SMS alas was necessary (and not just for Signal, but for messengers-with-SMS as well) because of the general play Google is doing with SMS → RCS. IMO, Signal held the idiot ball quite strongly by not just picking TextSecure from their old archives, tuning it up and releasing it as an updated, separate "Signal SMS" app.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

The weather as well.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Don't you mean a quarter of the footprint? It's half the size per side.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Meta

Annoying. Evil. Greedy. A machine designed to enhance, promote and reward sociopathy, just as capitalism is in general. Ultimately unneeded.

's Threads

Just about the same. A pisshole representing much of the worst of humanity.

and other instances preparing to defederating from them?

Just good praxis. Preventive care, and the simplest measure of such that any respectable instance would take. . Effectively self-defense and should count as that if for some weird reason it came down to legal trials.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Internet Archive archives now have DRM

Like, what's even the point of having them, then? Not much of an "Archive", are they? Didn't expect IA of all places to get enshittified.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the points! I'm gonna check those now that I have free time.

 

Hello, mostly-PC person here who still doesn't understand much. I recently upgraded my old unlocked phone to an unlocked one with LineageOS (in case the Android ROM matters for this). Want to set up the most important things such as banking apps for this, and I'm hitting a knowledge block.

Back in my time, we used Magisk for customizing phone modules and most importantly for hiding root and custom ROM status from apps that demand a "Google experience". For the newer phone I wanted to do this, but I'm finding extremely conflicting information on what is the current status of Magisk and if it should be used.

On one side, Magisk seems to still exist and still to be the recommended way for installing modules on phone, and it's still available on F-Droid.

On the other one, I find verifiable information that the developer of Magisk went to work with Google of all companies, plus indications that they removed the hide root mechanic from the program and that other stuff might be removed or the software abandoned outright.

So, in light of that I thought of asking here. Is Magisk still "legit" for custom ROMs? If it's not / if it's been enshittified, what is the current way to hide root from eg.: banking apps?

Thanks in advance.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

undefined> I think that as the fediverse grows, it might become common/necessary to have a few accounts in order to see everything you want to see.

Exactly. And that's good, because that's how the internet is supposed to function in the first place.

(Plus, it helps against the enshittification and all that)

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I understand the why to copy content from Reddit , even more if it's eg.: a community branching out from there to here, or people who are dissatisfied there trying to rebuild here. But those things ought to be done manually to build community, otherwise you are just building up yet another glorified aggregator.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

To be fair, my understanding of the entire internet is that the entire point is that they remain separate. They can sync on their own if they wanna, but they are still separate instances organizationally and logically, as they should.

After all, if that was not the case, Lemmy would be a ripe space for cybersquatting and "domain" hijacking. I could just go to a random server, or spin my own in just 30 minutes, create !PineapplePizza@MyOwnServer.tld and BAM! Now PineapplePizza is granted to me across the entire Fediverse. I become the ultimate master.

Sometimes the analogy to email is used. JohnMastodon@protonmail.com does not need to be the same user (and authority) as JohnMastodon@mailbox.org ; in fact, the entire system relies on the expectation that they "should" not be the same.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Isn't Discord more of the same tho? Closed platform, not indexable (unlike Reddit), centralized, etc.

[–] nintendiator@lemmy.fmhy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Ultimately I might have to sorta "go back" if only to post to remind people that I'm also (more) available elsewhere.

view more: next ›