lambalicious

joined 1 year ago
[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 9 points 3 days ago

Sounds cute, but in the US electoral system having a "massive lead" among a state's {subset} of {subset} matters exactly zero. All that matters is having the lead in the whole state proper.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

7.8 / Too Much Water.

~~(trumpets soundfont when?)~~

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 5 days ago

If you are using Gnome distros: you can feel exactly what it feels like getting back to working in a restricted, overhyped, overbranded environment like Windows.

If you are using Ubuntu: you can get advertising during your system's software upgrades. No, really.

If you are using Arch: you can post aroudn the internet saying you use Arch btw.

Depending on the distro, you can use some alternative software stacks, but that's mostly the backend (eg.: systemd versus openRC, Apache vs Nginx, X vs Wayland); most "desktop app" level is mostly the same for each desktop environment, is kinda the point.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 5 days ago (1 children)

But yeah, centralization should happen.

Fam, we are here precisely because we don't want centralization.

If you want that, Reddit and Facebook and BS are that way.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not only that, he's likely using the whole "I'm Finnish" thing as an excuse. According to Wikipedia at least, he's now an American citizen living in -of all places, Silicon Valley.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

Tell that to the Google and Microsoft employees collaborating on the kernel.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not even Taiwan claims to be a country though. They claim to be the sole legitimate government of China, hence their actual name, The Republic Of China,

Isn't that, by definition, calling yourself a country?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago

I’m afraid that if the sanctions will continue to be a go-to method of dealing with geopolitical rivals, we may end up with a few divergent forks. One for US and “the west” block, one for [...]

Considering that that this idea of making a Linux for the US vs a Linux for "the rest of the world" was what made me ditch Fedora for Debian, it'd be a shame to have it happen to Linux as well. Like, sure, an alternative will emerge, but where does one go while that progresses to be daily-driver? Haiku?

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago

Maybe it's time to fork the Linux Foundation and fix those two problems.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Interesting! Didn't know that was what it was for. I always thought it was merely a storage backend.

Any metrics on how many instances are using it and how much deduplication is it doing? EDIT: I see the numbers on their page, I was wondering more about people or instances using their own copy of it, since it's open source.

[–] lambalicious@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Usually the issue of media storage (photos, videos, etc) is brought in as an Issue. For now I'll skirt the "legal ramifications" including copying media and privacy, as those are an ever changing landscape of legal wanking that wankers can speak of much better than one can (and evil wanking still needs to be fought against).

One idea I've seen floated around is to have some sort of cooperative CDN for instances. Let's say four or five relatively kindred instances, make a commitment to last and pool their resources to maintain a joint CDN from from which they'll get their "media federation" from. This would reduce costs and issues a lot, since by the very nature of the fediverse, if everyone builds their own caches most of those caches are going to be hosting most of the same content. Basically: deduplication, but the poor man's version.

Another alternative is to just ditch storage of videos and images. Just take links to Elsewhere and let Elsewhere handle it.

 

RFC 3339, the "alternative" to ISO 8061, was extended to RFC 9957, which also allows adding interpretative tags.

Sounds like unnecessary complexification to me. What is wrong if anything with "2024-04-26"?

 

Today in our newest take on "older technology is better": why NAT rules!

 

Hey everyone I was wondering how do you spice up your cursors, icons, themes, etc., In particular for desktop environments such as XFCE, Mate. Are there any good repositories to use?

I've taken a look at a number of apparently cloned sites like "xfce-look.org", "kde-look.org", "gnome-look.org", but while they seem to show a wide offering of themes, it seems downloading from them is blocked via uBO since it reports a "fp2" fingerprinting script without which apparently downloads are not enabled. Are those sites trustworthy? They seem to be associated to a "OpenDesktop" initiative of which the only reputation I can find is that they were added to EasyList Privacy blocklist.

If there are other alternative hubs or repos from which to theme a distro (as agnostically as posisble) that'd be welcome info.

Cheers. Thanks. Et cetera.

 

publicado de forma cruzada desde: https://lemmy.world/post/9470764

  • ISO 8601 is paywalled
  • RFC allows a space instead of a T (e.g. 2020-12-09 16:09:...) which is nicer to read.
 

I've seen the Wikipedia article on year 9 doesn't mention anything of relevance happening during November. Closest thing seems to be September. Since people around have spent a few years making lots of ruckus about how the date with "9, 11" has some sort of importance as a date, I was wondering if I'm missing something here.

 

Basically title. 2019 edition of the Standard denotes the "T" prefix to time as mandatory (except in "unambiguous contexts"):

01:29:59 is now actually T01:29:59, with the former form now designated as an alternative

But date does not have a "D" prefix, not even in "ambiguous contexts".

1973-09-11 never needs to be something like eg.: D1973-09-11

Anyone know the reasoning behind this change and what is the intended use? The only time-only format with separators that I can think would be undecidable in ambiguous contexts would be hh:mm which I guess could be mistaken for bible verses?

 

I mean, it's the obvious choice. So why not? Maybe we can do with the zoom on the cat if there is a better version.

view more: next ›