iie

joined 4 years ago
[–] iie@hexbear.net 13 points 1 day ago (1 children)

It kinda feels like fash have captured social media.

[–] iie@hexbear.net 2 points 4 days ago

I see, that makes sense!

[–] iie@hexbear.net 9 points 4 days ago (3 children)

Thank you for this fascinating writeup!

Because it's so cheap and easy to start, it would be really simple for a billionaire (or single nation) to just start doing this in secret without the world noticing until the temperature reduction signal became detectable by the scientific community at large. At that point, we're locked in and the single-actor geoengineer has effectively taken the world hostage. This fucking sucks for obvious reasons.

This part kind of confused me though. Wouldn't we only be locked in after decades of aerosol dispersal had accumulated a substantial warming debt?

[–] iie@hexbear.net 7 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Some Hexbears are currently matching donations in this thread, so now is an especially good time to donate

*I actually don't know if the matching is still happening

[–] iie@hexbear.net 2 points 6 days ago

it definitely doesn't have to be like that. Adult life does not need to be a hamster wheel of drudgery for society to function.

[–] iie@hexbear.net 3 points 6 days ago

Dr. Fatima is great, I second the recommendation

[–] iie@hexbear.net 5 points 6 days ago

"Wow, that's the planet we own. And none of those people get to go up here like I do. This rules!"

[–] iie@hexbear.net 8 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Maybe the goal of the offensive was to generate positive headlines that might prolong western funding for a little while longer?

[–] iie@hexbear.net 9 points 1 week ago (2 children)

also, I think youth is more emotionally vivid, and emotional experiences form stronger friendships

[–] iie@hexbear.net 8 points 1 week ago

I'm also curious about the variation between the post title and the body. The latter is his weak ass attempt to justify his own behavior which is one thing. But why does he want you to do the same so badly? Surely he knows "might as well" isn't a compelling argument for anything. I won't leave my house for "might as well".

I think he's probably rattled by Trump and doesn't want to admit how much

[–] iie@hexbear.net 37 points 1 week ago

I think they are insinuating that a large number of Arab Americans, somewhere between 12% and 53%, are too racist to vote for a black person.

[–] iie@hexbear.net 5 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Yeah I would, if someone gave it to me. Probably better than it looks. Not what I'd make for myself though.

Also I'd have to eat it fast before the fries got soggy. Formerly crispy food becoming soggy grosses me out for some reason.

 

The presenter is very corny though

26
submitted 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) by iie@hexbear.net to c/videos@hexbear.net
 

Abstract

Recent research has demonstrated that extreme waves, waves with crest to trough heights of 20 to 30 meters, occur more frequently than previously thought. Also, over the past several decades, a surprising number of large commercial vessels have been lost in incidents involving extreme waves. Many of the victims were bulk carriers. Current design criteria generally consider significant wave heights less than 11 meters (36 feet). Based on what is known today, this criterion is inadequate and consideration should be given to designing for significant wave heights of 20 meters (65 feet), meanwhile recognizing that waves 30 meters (98 feet) high are not out of the question. The dynamic force of wave impacts should also be included in the structural analysis of the vessel, hatch covers and other vulnerable areas (as opposed to relying on static or quasi-dynamic analyses).

Introduction

Recent research by the European Community has demonstrated that extreme waves—waves with crest to trough heights of 20 to 30 meters—occur more frequently than previously thought (MaxWave Project, 2003). In addition, over the past several decades, a surprising number of large commercial vessels have been lost in incidents involving extreme waves. Many of the victims were bulk carriers that broke up so quickly that they sank before a distress message could be sent or the crew could be rescued.

There also have been a number of widely publicized events where passenger liners encountered large waves (20 meters or higher) that caused damage, injured passengers and crew members, but did not lead to loss of the vessel. This is not a new phenomenon; there are well-documented events dating back to at least the early 1940s.

These two facts, vessel losses combined with knowledge that waves larger than previously considered likely may be encountered, suggest that reviewing vessel design criteria may be necessary. (Smith, 2006).

 

The twitter thread is referenced in this excellent article by the same journalist, Alan MacLeod, which I posted here yesterday, but I think it deserves its own post.

Thread reader: https://threadreaderapp.com/thread/1818050593468072023.html

If you don't feel like clicking a link, here are the tweets transcribed, with some links added:

 

“I am actually kind of blown away by how advanced this system is, particularly compared to the backward nature of the U.S., so I am completely impressed,” Jodi Dean, a professor and political scientist, said.

view more: next ›