goldfndr

joined 1 year ago
[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 1 points 3 months ago

Au contraire! With a three character month, period separation isn't needed, and the date is shorter. (Admittedly there's likely to be a language translation issue, depending on audience.)

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

In other words, wipe the USB stick.

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 months ago

Never mind the template, I want a link to the calipers you used to measure the Feet of Shelf so precisely

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 2 points 8 months ago

Obviously "Not!" followed bacause people were unsure how to spell that word.

Not!

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 2 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Appending "_1" would've been better.

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 12 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The Stranger, 2005

I don't know if SCAN considered obtaining V-chip encoding, which would've cost close to $2k that year for encoding equipment; perhaps their license forbade such encoding.

ACLU, 2000

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

320k people voted.

1000 is quite the hyperbole.

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If you're asking about more imagery coverage, Mapillary has a lot. The wiki has a list of street-level imagery articles.

OpenStreetMap is more about the map database, so any imagery association tends to be loose, and is more for use as a useable source for ground truth.

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Have you checked out Every Door?

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 year ago

StreetComplete is intended for local, on-the-ground surveying only. Editing remotely is not supported, and will result in problems.

(I'm not sure whether you're editing remotely vs reminiscing during in-person visits, phrasing is slightly ambiguous.)

[–] goldfndr@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But… is it posted here? This intentional degradation/rot feels like the burning of Alexandria.

If one has a history of only making comments that they don't consider to have value then, maybe.

view more: next ›