elrik

joined 1 year ago
[–] elrik@lemmy.world 11 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

I see triangles, I upvote.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 35 points 1 day ago

You know what this reminds me of? Alex Jones repeatedly lying about the Sandy Hook school shooting and having to pay over a billion dollars after his followers repeatedly harassed and threatened those families.

How is this thoroughly debunked lying by Trump and Vance any different?

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 6 points 2 days ago

I'm doing my part!

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Is fuckboy really a curse word?

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 3 points 4 days ago

You know what would be great, would be to hold these weirdos liable for the time and expense that public agencies have incurred to deal with the bomb threats and idiots they've directly incited.

Freedom of speech is not freedom from consequences.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 9 points 4 days ago

Sure, but what does that have to do with this picture? The bridge looks deteriorated on that leading edge because 75 trucks have crashed into it at speed.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 2 points 4 days ago

Or counting has gotten better

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 70 points 1 week ago (6 children)

What kind of lame equivocation is "second best?" If he's "second best" in a debate with two people, then that means HE LOST.

Are these GOP lawmakers and analysts so spineless and beholden to Trump that they cannot discuss this as just one more - in a long list - of his failures?

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 17 points 1 week ago

The combined wealth of the ~750 US billionaires at the end of 2023 was about $5.2T. Total individual federal income tax revenue in 2023 was $2.2T.

So it seems non-billionaires could go federal tax free for 2 full years.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I'm not sure how true this perception is in more recent years. Many popular sites, with enormous traffic volumes that could drive digital impression ad revenue, are instead pushing subscriptions or other monetization models.

For instance, the New York Times makes — by far — more money on digital subscriptions than digital advertising. Digital advertising revenues are also declining for them.

Another example is Spotify, where ad revenue from their ad-supported tier did not cover their operational costs and now represents around only a tenth of their revenue compared to subscriptions.

The exceptions to this are generally search and social media sites, where the product for sale on these sites are the users themselves. They're just advertising platforms, which of course make their money from digital advertising.

So I'd say one issue with digital advertising is that it often does not pay the bills for the site owner. Its value is tied to its ability to convert visitors to buyers, but it has to be ramped up to such an extreme level it instead only creates bad experiences.

[–] elrik@lemmy.world 14 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I go through significant efforts to block digital advertising at multiple levels. Yet, I do not find it difficult to discover new things to buy (from both small and large businesses).

For myself, I suspect most of that is supported through online communities related to my interests and hobbies. Those purchases feel more informed and often more intentional too.

 

Completed my Mandalorian costume just in time for Halloween.

view more: next ›