cloudless

Most of the stars we see are several thousand light-years away from Earth. That means we are seeing the stars' past as well.

This is impressive!

Is one of them supposed to be a double?

If you want to purposefully misunderstand what I said, feel free to do so.

It is actually quite cool to be able to travel virtually when my body is no longer capable. The technology will have advanced dramatically in 2 decades.

Weather (clouds), moonlight.

And the fact that I have responsibilities as an adult, and it is not easy to go to an actually remote location at the right time.

Going to a dark site is not as easy as "just drive an hour from your home."

Take a look at this: https://science.nasa.gov/solar-system/skywatching/how-to-find-good-places-to-stargaze/

Flat earthers have access to all the information yet they still decide that flat earth is true.

I am not saying that current AI is intelligent. I am just seeing similarity between how human and AI process information.

I always go back to Kiss Launcher after trying other launchers. With a huge amount of apps, there is no point trying to organise the icons. Nothing beats typing the first letter and launch.

They have to update the training data with the latest findings. Some AI models may use external sources to fetch the most current information.

In a way, human intelligence is like that.

People used to think earth used to be the centre of the universe, because everybody said so. Would you say that only Nicolaus Copernicus was intelligent?

When I was young I saw the night sky with the milky way clearly visible. I never got the chance to see it again.

I travelled to the top of a remote mountain free of any light pollution or air pollution. It was a dark night with new moon. The sky was completely clear. I still had good eyesight at that time.

The starry night sky was magnificent and mesmerizing.

Do you? Tell us more.

You got lots of downvotes, but actually not too far from reality.