candywashing

joined 10 months ago
[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 17 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Antenna Pod is great. Podverse is also pretty decent, especially for downloading as an .mp3

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 4 points 8 months ago

Not 100% sure about the flatpak, but if you have access to the terminal interface, the command line app is really well done and you can turn of "secure core"

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 4 points 8 months ago (3 children)

This looks so good! Are knitting machines like that pricey?

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 12 points 8 months ago (4 children)

Downside is we have unique buttholes, so I assume that extends to other gentials. Fun new privacy attack here

https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/why-scientists-created-smart-toilet-recognizes-your-bum-180974641/

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Check out NoJS and Ublock Origin, makes browsing even these sites somewhat bearable - at least allows their text to stand on its own

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 19 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Is 3+ the age restriction?

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 15 points 8 months ago (2 children)

What app are you using to see this traffic?

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Well if you and 2 of your friends did it, then voilà you'd have a blockchain with no tech bros and no DNS. It's an idea, just because it has been executed poorly doesn't make it bad in every situation

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 1 points 8 months ago

Yeah, the internet is, but what I'd envision would be separate intranets who could communicate to each other if they want. So Brazil could talk to India, but they wouldn't have to. The block chains could be transparent to trusted systems and opaque to other intranets. Block chain also could be more similar to Elastic Search DB or Mongo DB, where it takes a majority of servers to confirm the validity of a tramsaction before solidifying a change

Just tossing the idea out there

Most people who shit on "blockchain" don't grasp the nuances. For instance, a hashsums can verify a piece of code is valid, but who's providing the hashsum? If it's on the same server, how do we trust it? If it's on a validator's server, who is validating that validator? This is a fundamental problem in computer science and blockchain is one of the solutions

I shit on blockchain because there's high probability of a backdoor in 90% of all computers and most software is vulnerable, so even if the blockchain isn't vulnerable directly, it most likely is on a different level

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 2 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Do you mean the audience or the subject matter?

[–] candywashing@infosec.pub 60 points 8 months ago (4 children)

This seems inaccurate

view more: ‹ prev next ›