autismdragon

joined 4 years ago
[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 10 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Didnt they explicitly make them a polycule in the comics? No?

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 7 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm pretty sure they're explicitly a triad now lol.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah idk how to communicate this any better. She looks like the polyogonal video game version of an adult woman to me. I really cant be any more specific than that.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 13 points 3 months ago

Middle school is the woooooorst. Thats the peak of "kids are brutal" and bullying and shit. For me things started to chill out more each year of highschool. But 6th-8th were just awful for me.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 3 points 3 months ago

Jotaro's almost too absurd for me to have that reaction too because its just silly lmao.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 1 points 3 months ago (5 children)

Idk I've worked with kids and I've seen girls "overdevelop early" and they still look like kids to me? Ive definitely seen girls 15-17 who can pass for adults with like makeup and in posed photos but the game gets given away in how they behave almost always. Maybe like if its a professional child actress around that age playing a part consistently and you never see them out of the role lol. But even then though like, they dont look like THIS

Kasumi to me is a definitively 20+ looking character and cannot pass for younger regardless of her canon age. I have never seen a child that looks like that and again, I've worked in childcare a lot.

Boys though yeah I guess. I mean Ive never seen that but I can imagine it I suppose.

To be clear, I obviously agree that real children who pass as older should not be sexualized, thats not in question here. I just think that animated media that creates characters that look fairly definitively 20+ but have canon ages of 15-17 are doing something extremely weird that I don't understand and seems unnecessary. Especially if the character is sexualized. Unless there's like a specific story relevance to their age it seems purposeless and uncomfortable.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago

If they wanted to add a lady with a petite build to make the cast more diverse, they could have easily done so without also making her this child-like

Yeah, I dont disagree with this part. They definitely could have done more to do that.

Luckily this weird break in my brain where I dont read that as anything but a petite and youthful adult woman in a costume only applies to animated characters lmao. Otherwise I'd be in need of professional help.

As is though, yeah, looking at her I can at least see where youre coming from. But its still not how she reads for me.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Then Marie Rose comes out and she looks like a middle schooler and acts and talks like a little girl

The "looks like a middle schooler" is the part that I'm not getting here, because that doesn't come across to me. I just still see a petite adult woman. If anything, I'm a bit annoyed at the way it seems people think that like, adult women all look like Lara Croft, and there's no such thing as skinny ones with small boobs and babyfaces. When like, fashion models exist. But I get y'alls argument about how she was clearly designed with that audience in mind. The games having cutscenes where she acts young isnt something Ive totally been exposed to because Ive not played them and what little I have seen that hasnt really come across. But I've described elsewhere how the upbeat genki girl archtype never read as "acts like a kid" for me either. So I'm honestly not sure still if thatd come across.

Anyway I agree with your and Ulysses take that theres something going on with Namco adding her and Honoka for horny purposes at the same time, but I have to rely on others with the idea that they read that way to y'all lmao. I would literally never notice on my own.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 4 points 3 months ago (7 children)

If its story relevant, sure, but it isnt here is the point. Also like I'm sorry but in this case I have never seen a 16 year old that looks like Kasumi in my life.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 9 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I'm glad I'm not alone on this lmao.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago (1 children)

I feel like one of the only "she looks/acts underage regardless of canon" character in fiction where i've seen it is Fire Emblem Awakening Nowi who 100% looks and acts 12 to me (and should not have been dressed like that or made marriageable lmao). But even that was largely more because of the appearance than behavior. I swear the "acts like a kid" thing just goes over my head with like genki girl types. Rikku (who is canonically underage, but regardless) is another one like that where people will cite her behavior and I'll just be like "what? she's just upbeat?" And yes I was aghast and confused when I found out Rikku's canon age and still percieve her as college student aged.

Idk I genuinely think my brain is broken these conversations make me feel like an unhinged freak because everyones seeing things I dont see. Like i've had private conversations with people who agree with me but public ones always seem to go the other direction lmao. Like I guess I'll fall back on "subjectivity exists" but it is weird to me and kinda alienating.

[–] autismdragon@hexbear.net 6 points 3 months ago (3 children)

marie honoka and now (well, 5 years ago?) nico seem 14-16.

This is subjective? Yeah I just dont perceive that shit. I wish it was more understood that subjectivity exists and people have different experiences with media. Like "Marie acts like a 12 year old" is just, not coding for me. I dont see it.

Then again I've not played the games lmao. I just see screenshots of their still designs and fan art. So maybe it comes across in cutscenes. And yeah I dont see it with Nico either since you mentioned her. Probably even less than the other two actually since she's dressed as a professional.

The only thing I can get is Ulysses point about them clearly being designed with a certain audience in mind. But thats not going to click for me ever because of the way my brain processes it. The face thing doesnt help because I know plenty of baby faced adults lmao. Some even post on this website and get annoyed when this discourse comes up for that reason!

 
 

So I found out a guy who we used to mutually call each other best friend is having a baby. Its been a LONG time since we talked regularly. We still live in reasonable distance from each other, but far enough that its difficult to connect. And also Ive been depressed and not socially active irl for a good 8 years now lol. My only good irl friend friend dumped me a year ago over a stupid misunderstanding. But i had no friendship ending drama with this other friend.

Anyway, I was like "hey itd be nice to be part of your kid's life". Thing is, Im very good with kids, and thats like a core part of who I am as a person, but something my irl friends have repeatedly shown that they do not understand about me lol. (that other irl friend friend dumping me's reasoning for doing it included a very fundemental misunderstanding of that for example).

Anyway, my friend there said "idk its been so long since we've talked, maybe eventually" and I was taken aback a bit. I mean, on one level I get it. The mother of his kid doesnt even know me so thats a big reason for that. But like...

OK, studies show that autistic people do NOT do the whole "friendship degrading with noncommunication" thing. Something I always found weird in the Sims is how friendships degrade when you dont talk to them frequently (unless you max them out lol). Stardew does the same thing I think? And besides finding that annoying just from a gameplay perspective, I also didnt get it because like... wait is that how people think? Because i DONT. I dont really lose feelings of affection or freindship from noncommunication alone. Someone needs to DO something to me for me to change my opinion of them. And like, me and this friend have had our drama lol. He's a bit of a narcissist, not a "cant safely be friends with him" kind of narcissist but a "friendship with him will have toxic moments" type. And he mistreated an ex pretty bad, but that ex is still friends with him so I won't impose victimhood on her. (Our mutual ex is another story there, I really need to reconnect with her someday, but I always was very confused who was the perpetrator of mistreatment in that relationship because they both seemed pretty toxic, but anyway). But like. NONE of that is 'Wow you are NOT my friend anymore" stuff. Just stuff to be aware of and work around for me. Idk.

These are not coherent thoughts completrly but I like that I can dump them here from time to time.

 
 
 
 
 
view more: ‹ prev next ›