Zombie

Selling them. Divided by 66m people. Pennies,

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Crown_Jewels_of_the_United_Kingdom

I think you're severely misrepresenting how much value is in the crown jewels.

The people making them were paid.

Were they paid a fair value for their labour? Looking at the exploitation of workers throughout history, probably not.

You also fail to mention that many of these jewels were likely extracted using slave or poverty wage labour.

But spending on building palaces has always resulted in money going to the rest of society and improving the lives of the rest of the nation

If instead of building one huge fucking building on one huge estate for one family we spread the land between the people and built multiple homes for multiple people there would be far more money going to the rest of society and many more people's lives would be improved.

The monarchy are a parasite and you're an apologist for that. You seem to think you're using facts and logic to explain their being but there's glaring holes in your analysis.

We're poor as a people and a nation because we allow and give excuses for the ultra rich to be rich. There's always going to be people who value wealth and those who don't but to allow those who value wealth to hoard so much that we as a society struggle to function is moronic and should be abolished. I'm just an Internet nerd who likes to read, not a politician, so I don't know where the line should be drawn on personal wealth but allowing a handful of people to have more wealth than huge swathes of society is morally and functionally wrong.

Please look at this website to help try and wrap your head around the sheer vast wealth that is accumulated by the richest in society.

https://mkorostoff.github.io/1-pixel-wealth/?v=3

"Butter the toast, eat the toast, shit the toast. God life's relentless."

Solarpunk memes? More like adhd memes

https://youtu.be/6AYv6rV3NXE

At the very bottom of the page:

Notes to editors

Limited exceptions to the ban may be required for safety or restoration purposes. An exemption is also anticipated to protect the historic rights of freeminers to mine personal gales in the Forest of Dean.

The government has laid a Written Ministerial Statement confirming that it will introduce legislation to restrict the future licensing of new coal mines, by amending the Coal Industry Act 1994, when Parliamentary time allows.

It DidN't hAPpen eXActLy aS I ImAgiNed so It diDN't hAPpen

Read up on your history, it likes to repeat itself.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Beer_Hall_Putsch

It did happen, it just failed.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/January_6_United_States_Capitol_attack

It was manufactured by the Americans, put into space by the Americans, controlled by the Americans until they handed over control to the RAF, and was stated in the article to be "dual control". It was clearly the Americans.

Why is an event that happened in the 1970s getting an article now?

https://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-60072194

But we have flying cars

That's how anarchy has been portrayed by propaganda media since time immemorial because it scares those in power.

Anarchy means without hierarchy. That's it. Rules can still be agreed upon. It just means there isn't one person, or group of elites, setting and enforcing the rules, but that they're agreed upon by consensus.

Just like hierarchical systems, there are many different variations of anarchy. Very few, if any, serious forms call for chaos and everything goes.

Why? Because it would just lead straight back to Might is Right. "I'm bigger, stronger, more powerful than you, so I'll make you do as I wish" isn't a part of anarchist theory.

Anarchism, despite seeming a simple concept on paper, is a difficult and complicated idea. Not because of the core principles but because humans and human behaviour are weird and hypocritical at times.

That's MTG, right? Who's the jumpsuit guy?