Womdat10

I'm assuming your from the UK by your instance. This would be like saying that everyone in the UK is responsible for the UK funding a genocide.

While you're mostly right, it isn't really half because we have this fun thing called the electoral college, that likes to make Republicans win.

Oh, shoot, I was way to tired to see that when I wrote this. Thanks for the clarification.

This is just a bad argument, if an omniscient being did exist, then it would know the statement was false, I'm sure this was supposed to be a logic loop, but it isn't one.

I dont have them on hand, but I've seen a few polls in swing states where 5 or so percent more undecided voters would be more likely to vote for Harris if she promised an arms embargo, as opposed to less likely.

Yes obviously, but it doesn't excuse the other.

So are you agreeing with what I said about both people being murderers or not? Because of you are then you agree that it isn't a wash, and if you disagree then you are fucking stupid.

I was about to say that this doesn't belong on not the onion because this is totally realistic. Then I realized this was the onion

That doesn't work in this context, if one person murders someone, and another murders 2 people, both are still murderers, one just is a worse murderer(as in more evil, not as in worse at committing murder)

I'm assuming you've never seen her debates, or statements about the issue. If you had, you'd know that she pledged to continue supporting Isreal.

Tell me please, if one person committed a murder, and another person committed 2 murders, would both be evil, or just the one who did 2? Also, this isn't advocating for non-voting, just pointing out that both people are evil. It also never says that they are equally evil, so this isn't a "both sides" argument either.