TedZanzibar

joined 1 year ago
[–] TedZanzibar 6 points 3 months ago

Neither does the BBC's couch to 5k app, for who knows what reason.

[–] TedZanzibar 4 points 3 months ago

You are a legend, thank you!

[–] TedZanzibar 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Any chance of a link to the clip?

[–] TedZanzibar 5 points 3 months ago

Sad to see my home town mixed up in this but thank you for showing these idiots that they're outnumbered and their views are not welcome in civilised society.

[–] TedZanzibar 20 points 3 months ago

I hear they also wore onions on their belts, which was the style at the time. And nickels had pictures of bumblebees on them...

[–] TedZanzibar 11 points 3 months ago

ohnoanyway.jpg

[–] TedZanzibar 11 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Some of the very first ones were great; Trevor the vampire, and the one that birthed Homsar (possibly the very first one?). Stuck with it for all the classics; lightswitch rave, Trogdor, teen girl squad, 20X6, Sweet Cuppin' Cakes (I still bring up Eh, Steve! to this day).

Eventually they started getting longer and longer and lost a lot of the punchiness and I stopped watching.

I think my favourite is probably Trogdor. The way Strong Mad has just carved 'DAGRON' into the table always makes me chuckle for some reason.

[–] TedZanzibar 2 points 3 months ago

Ohhhhh I see. The wording on that page could be so much better!

[–] TedZanzibar 23 points 3 months ago

According to the Crown Prosecution Service, making indecent images can have a wide definition in the law and can include receiving them via social media.

Edwards's barrister Philip Evans KC told the court: "There’s no suggestion in this case that Mr Edwards has... in the traditional sense of the word, created any image of any sort."

I suppose the facts that he a) retained some of the images, b) didn't report having received them and c) continued talking to the man has some bearing on his charges.

[–] TedZanzibar 2 points 3 months ago (2 children)

I don't get it. What's it supposed to be doing?

[–] TedZanzibar 3 points 3 months ago

It's the same in the UK but "legal tender" doesn't mean what most people think it means.

When you buy something from a shop you're technically offering to enter a contractual relationship for the purchase of said goods. If the shop agrees to your terms, including how you'd like to pay, then the contract is ratified. If they don't accept your preferred method of payment then there is no contract of sale and there is no debt to be paid.

This is also why shops don't have to honour pricing errors; when you bring the item to the checkout you're technically just offering to buy it for the listed price and they can choose to reject your offer.

[–] TedZanzibar 3 points 3 months ago (1 children)

Yeah but seriously tho... What power?

view more: ‹ prev next ›