Tamo240

joined 9 months ago
[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 1 points 21 minutes ago

This is the exact metaphor I've been using when talking to people about the issue. Did we both get it from somewhere I can't remember, or is it just perfect?

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 3 points 21 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

The goal of this proposal is to advance a superset of C++ with a rigorously safe subset.

The subset is of the proposed syntax superset. Reason being because the superset also contains explicitly unsafe syntax similar to rust.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 27 points 1 day ago

Binary Large OBject

Basically any binary file, often objected to in open source repos because of the lack of source and 'openness'. See also the recent xz backdoor.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 5 points 2 days ago

IIRC the reason for this is because synthetic vanilla flavour was one of the first to be produced, so while actual vanilla is still quite valuable, it became the go-to 'default' flavour.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 1 week ago

It also doesn't run off battery power, hardly apples to apples.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 6 points 1 week ago

Presumably it will come back as some free-to-play, live-service microtransaction-filled nightmare that can be supported by a few whales and eventually make up the cost

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

They should gather that before they set the price. Once the box office doors open, increasing the price is price gouging plain and simple.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 4 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I disagree with this whole 'market price' thing because as a consumer you don't have constant opportunity to buy. You get one slot where you are are the front of the queue, and if you don't like the price then tough. It essentially just rewards those who got to the front sooner, and punishes later joiners.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 6 points 2 weeks ago

The Internet Archive does not create shareholder value

/s

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 5 points 2 weeks ago

Nobody is attacking your free choice, they're literally trying to give you another option. That's what free choice is all about.

If you are making an informed devision to remain with windows as it gets worse and worse, then that is up to you, but don't come at people for trying to offer you an alternative just because you've made that decision.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 10 points 2 weeks ago (5 children)

Bit weird to be so angry about this. The commenter is not 'basically just another marketer' because they have nothing (financial or otherwise) to gain from others using linux. They genuinely believe it is a better product and it is in your interests to use it.

Direct your anger at Microsoft if you feel as though you are being forced to do anything, they the ones choosing to enshitify Windows, and removing it as a viable option.

[–] Tamo240@programming.dev 2 points 2 weeks ago* (last edited 2 weeks ago) (1 children)

pendant

pedant?

Sorry

view more: next ›