SpaceScotsman

joined 1 year ago

I find it immensely infuriating that the article's byline shows they are reporting from 'London' when in fact this happened not just in a different city, Edinburgh, but in a completely different country, Scotland.

Sad about the pandas, there are far too many people that simply can't be trusted with fireworks. Limiting it to a single night in dedicated display venues run by licensed organisations wouldn't remove the noise entirely, but it would reduce the frequency and would probably help all animals.

That 2012 one looks like I've focused it as a UI component. I need to get out and touch some grass.

According to the 3 criteria mentioned in the article, YouTube wouldn't need to be banned, logging in to YouTube would be banned. YouTube is still functional (mostly) when logged out, and wouldn't violate those 3 criteria. The other services mentioned, like gaming, would be banned.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 11 points 3 weeks ago (3 children)

I thought elvish meant someone who likes rock and roll music

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 46 points 1 month ago (3 children)

You can't misgender a brand. You can't deadname a brand. You can't befriend a brand.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 5 points 2 months ago

I misread that as prefix and, honestly, forthwhence doesn't sound half bad.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 3 points 2 months ago

Women are a better person to be in the past than a good quality piece of wood

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

That was an OK finale.

I'm of two minds about the resolution with Ruby's mum. On one hand, there being no significance at all is a bit of a let down, but on the other hand when dealing with gods, the whole point of the power is the belief, and that explanation does tie everything up fairly neatly. (not sure why ruby kept snowing though). Seeing her get back together with her mum was a nice send off.

Getting rid of sutek by throwing him off into the vortex, and having that undo everything was a bit iffy for me. There's not been an established precedent that throwing someone into the time vortex undoes every action they ever did, and surely if that were the case that leads to a paradox?

Lots of call backs to past DW. Including the trend that at the end of the season every single person in the universe dies. But I guess that is the risk when you have a show that's gone on for so long, once you've pushed the limits of danger to the max, there's not really any way to escalate the tension further.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 5 points 5 months ago

Not a fan of the anagram stuff, but i can imagine myself as a kid really enjoying that. Looking forward to the finale, I hope it delivers.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 3 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

I'm not a bidgerton fan, I prefer my period dramas to be of the star trek variety. But this was still a good episode, I was getting echoes of "family of blood".

Rogue is interesting, we're given basically no back story but I was convinced they were going to tie the character somehow to Jack Harkness. I'm glad they actually followed through on the kiss and didn't just leave it teased, that would have been very 2005.

The marriage proposal scene got me thinking - the doctor is already married to river song. We know that she has had interactions with doctors other than 11, so the marriage seems to go beyond regens. How does marriage even work. Is that polygamy? Parallel monogamy?

I like the inclusion of nerd terminology like cosplay and dnd - Get the kids watching radicalised early :)

Ruby was good in this - clearly a competent companion that can think on her feet. I was kind of hoping we'd make more progress on the twist by now, I guess we're keeping all of that for the very end.

Lesson to take away - always build a backdoor into your deadlock seals.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago

I had not made that connection - there are definitely a lot of parallels. good catch. Compared with this current episode, I think the peril on the ship was a bit better set up, and there were more characters in that episode that I genuinely cared about.

[–] SpaceScotsman@startrek.website 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Alright, I have some feelings on this one.

First, I'm not a fan of when TV shows and movies use hones to have characters talk to each other. Texting is just awful (if I wanted to read, I'd read a book) and video chats often seem incredibly limiting and boring to me. Having a whole episode of that... ew.

The characters themselves, they're obviously meant to embody the worst of vapid superficial influencer types. But my god, but the end I was 100% on side with the rogue AI here. Finish them all off and spare me having to listen to them speak. Pity about that Ricky guy, he died an unexpectedly brutal death.

It felt a bit black mirrory, with the way it was shot, with the makeup and costumes, with the way the actors were just overly smiley and oblivious. But even with the theme of over-reliance on tech, I found the "I can't walk without the bubble" bit a bit of a stretch.

Morals: Don't walk staring at your phone, you'll walk right into traffic and die. Also felt a bit of environmentalism at the end - "I'm an expert, I can help, listen to me", and of course everyone thought they knew best so now they're all going to die.

We're no closer to figuring out the mysterious woman, and I'm struggling to find what the connection could be.

Best part of the episode: The 2 factor authentication from hell. Loved that.

view more: next ›