"Wikipedia concludes that Israel is committing genocide, thus ending an editorial debate"
SorteKanin
Yea it's cool. Although, regarding sublinks, it really looks like the project has stalled.
Very strange that such a change could lead to such a problem, but sometimes databases are weird black boxes like that 🤷
Thanks for all the work!
What was the bug in the end out of curiosity?
It doesn't really help for me, but the beauty of the fediverse is that it doesn't have to. You can like PieFed, I can prefer Lemmy and we can both still talk :)
On the other hand, it has some weirdly opinionated features:
- Hiding downvoted comments (mob rule)
- Marking people with many downvotes as "low reputation". I get it, getting many downvotes is a bad sign but I don't think the software should try to make a ruling here, I think human moderators should look at the whole picture. It doesn't make you a bad person that people disagree with you.
- Communities organized into "topics" - I'm not certain if these groupings are decided by the dev or the admin? Either way I find it a bit problematic.
- Marking certain communities as "low effort" and not counting "reputation" for those. I don't feel like the software should be making this kind of value judgement.
Tillykke! Jeg skifter også selv job her til december :)
Kender ikke til noget dansk specifikt. Tror nok det meste af den slags er landet under /r/dkfinance - men du skal da være velkommen til at lave indlæg i !finans@feddit.dk :)
For me this is the matrix sequels and Indiana Jones 4. All of them are absolutely fantastic.
It creates circles of like-minded people where it is really easy to reject “other” thoughts and accept “our” ideas without much questioning.
I know it sounds counter-intuitive, but there is an argument to be made that we should actually go back to smaller, more secluded forums on the internet that are less connected with outside views.
Tbf I do think it qualifies as title gore and at the very least it is missing a comma before "ending"