Perdendosi

joined 1 year ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Nothing wrong with that...

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Same happened to me. Then when posting I chose "unknown" or whatever language (not English) and it worked.

 

Love this watch. I love that it’s relatively clean, but has neat details that make it special, like the blingy Arabic numbers on the chapter ring, the fun and slightly blingy 7-link bracelet, the subtle concentric circle texture in the middle of the dial, and the way that the bezel kind of sinks into the mid-case (not visible in this photo), or the red rotor (ditto). I love that it has lume and 100m water resistance, so it can act as more of a GADA watch, but it’s still a little formal. I’ve been wearing dive watches a lot, but I’m so glad this is in my collection. It might be just a tad too formal for GADA, but it’d be in a 3-watch collection for sure.

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)
  1. Yes, some extreme shocks can harm mechanical watches.
  2. No, I don't know how much. I'm sure there are some people out there who've done some sort of calculations. But I feel like what we see and hear are just estimates, speculation, anectodal bias, or other shoddy evidence (maybe check Watchuseek). Just like the Reddit pic you sent -- it shows beat up gears from a chronograph with a warning about golfing. Down the post, the OP says he's a watchmaker and that watch came in from someone who claimed that they wore it playing golf. But guess what? There was also rust on the parts. The OP said "oh, that was due to a bad seal, not related to shock". So how are we supposed to believe OP's opinion that the teeth were damaged due to shock but that other evidence of damage was due to a separate cause, that ALSO didn't cause or contribute to the teeth and gear damage? Shoddy arguments to me. And sports watches were made to be worn while doing sports--they were worn that way before the advent of modern quartz watches and G-Shocks. But of course they're probably not the ideal watch to wear, since we have quartz watches that can deal with shock better.
  3. Yes, modern watches have some form of shock protection. How much really does depend on the watch.
  4. Would I wear a mechanical watch while biking? I guess it depends. It depends on the quality of the watch (in some ways, a higher quality sports/dive watch should withhstand shock better, because it's going to have more shock absorption built in, but on the other hand, if your watch is expensive, are you really going to put it in a risky situation?), it depends on how bad your roads are, really, and it depends on the cost.
  5. Let's just say this-- I bike commuted for about a year, and I almost always wore a mechanical watch. I went over potholes, and all of my watches survived. BUT, (a) I mostly wear dive-style watches, even to work, and (b) none of my watches cost more than $1000. So I'm willing to take those risks.

TL;dr-- yes, shocks might cause harm to mechanical watches. The amount of shock that can cause harm, and the risk of harm, are hard to calculate. Whether you decide to wear a mechanical watch while biking is a decision you have to make based upon your risk tolerance.

 

In an interview with CBS News last month, Suarez said deciding on a presidential bid was a “soul-searching process.” He also nodded to his lack of national name recognition, saying, “I’m someone who needs to be better known by this country.”

  1. Narcissistic much?
  2. It sounds like he's running for some cabinet postition.

It does seem, though, if Republicans focus on the conservative ideas that conservative minority voters care about, and aren't stupid about piling all people of color into the "enemy" category, they can make some significant gains and overcome the inevitable demographic disadvantage that they will face if they keep the GOP as the party of white Christians only. (And, byt the way, the Democrats have to stop taking racial minorities' votes for granted. That, I think, is one area where Biden shines.)

 

Cross-posted from !politics@beehaw.org

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Maybe you F'dU, but I think you were the stars of the party.

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ah ha, I was trying to do the short url (!utah@kbin.social), and that wasn't working. Thanks!

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (9 children)

So I'm looking for a magazine that I know is on kbin, that I want to subscribe from here. I've tried typing in the magazine name in the address bar (lemmy.world/c/Utah@kbin.social), I've tried searching in the "communities" search, and I'm just not finding it and getting errors. Direct linking works, but I then I can only subscribe if I have an account on kbin. Help?

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago

SBC also voted to affirm the explusions of two churches, including Saddleback Church, which was founded by highly respected author Rick Warren and is one of the largest baptist churches in the country. They claim nearly 25,000 people in weekly attendance. And Warren's books, including "The Purpose-Driven Life," are used all over, including in my then-relatively liberal Lutheran church. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Saddleback_Church

They were expelled because a woman acted as a youth pastor.

Wow. That's like kicking the Yankees out of MLB because the league thinks that players should be able to have long hair.

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The social media provider must "verify, using a commercially reasonable method" the person's identity and the relationship to the minor.

You cam do that through credit card probably.

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Weird. Works for me in Jerboa. What's the crash?

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

@deathworlder@lemmy.world

However for them, it’s not a big deal as the get the following benefits

All ~~undesirable~~ sane and productive users leave for fidiverse or other reddit alternatives. The remaining users will be ~~tame~~ batshit crazy like the users of FB, Instagram, posting conspiracy theories, lies, flames and other content that gets people riled up, but results in more eyes and more clicks. Which destroys Reddit as we know it, but still generates the income that will appeal to investors in an IPO

FTFY.

 

Hi folks! Though I'm not exmormon, I'm trying to get a Utah Community up at running in Lemmy.world. Of course, you don't have to have a connection to Utah to be exmormon, but just in case you do, or you're interested in Utah goings-on, I invite you to visit and subscribe. Thanks!

Utah Community

!utah@lemmy.world

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

You could say he was a pioneer.

 

I've played it a few times (I'm a percussionist), and I just love it. I have a few recordings, and my favorite is definitely not this P. Jarvi recording, (I can't remember my favorite, I'll have to look it up when I get home.) But any version is still awesome!~

[–] Perdendosi@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

There's a joke about attracting people who like working pipes and experiencing organs that I'm sure you've told a thousand times.... Though I don't know a ton about pipe organ-only music outside of the common Bach stuff, my favorite classical piece is Saint-Saens' Third Symphony, and I really like Percy Grainger's "The Power of Rome and the Christian Heart" (though the more I learn about him, the more I'm not sure I can like Percy Grainger...). I'll subscribe! Good luck with your community!

 

One of my favorite tracks on my favorite TMBG Album. I love the vibraphone, the production, and the concept of chasing something everyone says is great but is ultimately destructive

 

Welcome! This is a Lemmy Community dedicated to Utah, its news, politics, people, geography, recreation, and more.

Utahns, former Utahns, visitors, or just the Utah-curious are welcome. Whether you're a refugee from another online service or a Lemmy native, you're welcome here.

Keep it on topic, civil (though robust debate is perfectly fine), and about the posts, not about the person.

view more: next ›