Mardukas

joined 1 year ago
[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 30 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (2 children)

The article contains a number of what seems to be assurances from different groups that this was unplanned and a behaviour not representative of these people as a group. It's notable, however, that multiple people seem to have been able to sing along.

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Yes but appdata subfolder is local, locallow or roaming so the poster above you is still correct.

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 5 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This really is the worst possible example of a person to highlight. You really should be ashamed of yourself. Yes the man rose from hell but he was a mass murderer with no regard for anyone but himself.

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 38 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (3 children)

We shouldn't jump to conclusions

Immediately jumps to conclusions

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 12 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago)

The article states that an image was uploaded to X which seemed to imply that US foreign policy resulted in what is currently happening in Gaza, whereas Chinese policy leads to the current prosperity in Xinjiang. Which is quite a frightening comparison.

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 6 points 10 months ago

It's a gooseberry

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

Quite literally, I would say.

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (3 children)

What's there to police? It's not like most aggressors are openly grabbing people in their genitals for all to see. These people know that they are wrong and so they hide it. What am I, as a man against this behaviour, supposed to do about other men?

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Well of course it will be different. One has to do with another author publishing questionable data and the other would be related to misunderstanding of someone else's published data. In this case, the use of AI in writing is implied to result in authors not being in control of what they themselves publish.

All of these are bad but do not necessarily arise on purpose. But let's not add ways to muddy the already mudied waters of science.

[–] Mardukas@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago

'Some people with no eyesight identify as non-blind.'

14
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by Mardukas@lemmy.world to c/pics@lemmy.world