LGTM

joined 5 days ago
[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 16 hours ago

I keep seeing people put random content on PH and go viral, and atp I think it's time I start an abstract algebra course on OF (wait that's just tuition...)

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 16 hours ago

Praying the spirit of William Harrison occupies him today 😔

What is stable? I just run nix flake update then brew a coffee to accompany me for the next 12 hours

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 1 day ago (1 children)

C for [ˌt͡ʃɛ.kʰɪ.sl̥oʊ̯.ˈvɑ.kʰi.ə] (Yes I did narrow transcription for the purpose of making it look worse 💀)

I think it's kind of funny that they mention to allow the flat earth comments when just previously saying that they want to prevent cult-like behavior; flat-eathers won't listen despite the evidence. Then again, verifiability doesn't seem to be holding strong these days

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

I have quite literally dreamed about running neo/fastfetch 😭

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 4 points 2 days ago

I quite literally did this yesterday, but it's OK, my roommates already did before me :)

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 2 days ago

You know, this ain't so bad

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

I seriously thought I was reading Spanish at first

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 3 days ago

Not commenting on the validity of the post, but what is the area of a circle doing there? The only explanation I could see for calculus is if their profits were reported to them in an unclear manner (probably not...?) and then doing an optimization problem, but what kind of information must they be giving you to need calculus rather than using like dimensional analysis or something (or maybe it's a tiered system like tax brackets)

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 3 days ago

I wonder if such a situation could occur if we were in some huge medium where Cherenkov radiation could occur

[–] LGTM@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 days ago

Hmmmm, I guess that the premise was probably wrong then, since the object necessarily has to have mass and travel slower than c (I mean, a massless object would be constrained the by c anyways). The gravitational lensing is a good addition! I have no idea how I forgot, but I remember a hs physics class where this came up for new telescope images

view more: ‹ prev next ›