this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
127 points (96.4% liked)

NonCredibleDefense

3523 readers
4 users here now

Rules:

  1. Posts must abide by lemmy.world terms and conditions
  2. No spam or soliciting for money.
  3. No racism or other bigotry allowed.
  4. Obviously nothing illegal.

If you see these please report them.

Related communities:

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 5 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] BloodSlut@lemmy.world 23 points 1 year ago

anon singlehandedly draining the russian army of resourced

[–] zepheriths@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago

Speaking of which I need to visit my local milsurp soon

[–] mikyopii@programming.dev 4 points 1 year ago

WTF? Absolutely based anon.

[–] redcalcium@lemmy.institute 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Wait, Russian still sells military surplus even though they're currently at war and have trouble equipping their conscripts?

[–] vokkez@lemmy.world 11 points 1 year ago

It's less "surplus" and more stolen. Supply officers figuring out they can sell the gear coming through their post and make multiple times their annual salary from selling them to surplus groups. A lot of poorer countries have that problem, iirc it was a significant part of why the US wasn't willing to supply the Afghan military with tech.