this post was submitted on 13 Mar 2024
494 points (96.1% liked)

World News

39102 readers
2834 users here now

A community for discussing events around the World

Rules:

Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.


Lemmy World Partners

News !news@lemmy.world

Politics !politics@lemmy.world

World Politics !globalpolitics@lemmy.world


Recommendations

For Firefox users, there is media bias / propaganda / fact check plugin.

https://addons.mozilla.org/en-US/firefox/addon/media-bias-fact-check/

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

Trans youth will no longer be prescribed puberty blockers at NHS England gender identity clinics in a new “blow” to gender-affirming healthcare.

Puberty blockers are a type of medicine that prevent puberty from starting by blocking the hormones – like testosterone and oestrogen – that lead to puberty-related changes in the body. In the case of trans youth, this can delay unwanted physical changes like menstruation, breast growth, voice changes or facial hair growth.

On Tuesday (12 March), NHS England confirmed the medicine, which has been described as “life-saving” medical care for trans youth, will only be available to young people as part of clinical research trials.

The government described the move as a “landmark decision”, Sky News reported. It believed such a move is in the “best interests of the child”.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Th4tGuyII@kbin.social 135 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (72 children)

God damn Tories. What do they know about “best interests of the child” that a doctor doesn't already know? Less than nothing is the answer.

If a young person is suffering from gender dysmorphia to the point of considering gender affirmation procedures, then I think it'd be in their best interest to not exacerbate that condition. Delaying the onset of puberty via puberty blockers until they're at the age where that can legally consent to such procedures isn't exactly novel.

Even if they eventually decide not to undergo those procedures, all you habr to do is take them off the blockers and they'd undergo puberty as normal. There's not all that much downside for an awful lot of upside for those in need.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 28 points 8 months ago

What you fail to take into account is the pink haired lesbian man haters dragging kids into alleyways and stopping them from having puberty. This is a totally real thing. A child can't even walk to school without being accosted by pink haired lesbian man haters armed with syringes and a copy of a Dworkin book.

load more comments (71 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 93 points 8 months ago

Oh, great. Vulnerable children and desperate parents searching for prescription medication on the black market. What could go wrong?

Mission accomplished.

[–] dugmeup@lemmy.world 92 points 8 months ago

Right wing conservatives can go pound sand. Talk about the government pushing itself between a doctor and patient care.

A landmark bullshit decision.

[–] drmeanfeel@lemmy.world 90 points 8 months ago (1 children)

All right wingers want for Christmas is increased suicidality of anyone unlike themselves

[–] Snapz@lemmy.world 27 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Or probably more accurately if you look at right wing scandals, people that think similarly to them but are brave enough to live their truth and not try to hide behind a bible and pay their reality away.

Conservatives are cowards. They mainline fear 24/7, they feel list without it.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Korne127@lemmy.world 80 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Best interest of the child my ass. I knew and know so many trans kids that suffer(ed) so much from such awful transphobic laws.
That's just purely disgusting and will have horrible consequences for so many people. I am so sorry for every trans kid in England that suffers from this. :(

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 34 points 8 months ago (6 children)

40 years of Hollyweird / Music Industry / Olympics trainer agents pumping their youngest stars full of this shit in order to squeeze an extra year or two of revenue out of them? Fine. Cool. Good. No problems detected.

Some trans youth have a legitimate medical need for deferring puberty, while they come to terms with their gender and sexuality? Fuck you. Prohibited. Go directly to jail.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] gnutrino@programming.dev 69 points 8 months ago (5 children)

So does this also apply to precocious puberty or is this purely a fuck you to trans people?

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 35 points 8 months ago

They're going to have to pull an Alabama and do some matching legal and mental gymnastics.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] Mouselemming@sh.itjust.works 56 points 8 months ago (3 children)

Time to start some really large clinical trials.

Which wouldn't be a bad idea anyway, tracking long-term outcomes.

[–] frezik@midwest.social 43 points 8 months ago (21 children)

GnRH was discovered in 1971, and has been available since the '80s. We have a pretty good idea of their long term effects. There could be more about effects on transgender youth in particular, but everything done so far shows it's safe.

load more comments (21 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Phegan@lemmy.world 50 points 8 months ago

TERF island strikes again

[–] TIMMAY@lemmy.world 45 points 8 months ago (20 children)

I dont want to speak to the social aspect of this issue, but I have to imagine that blocking puberty has some crazy side effects. How long has this medical technology been in use and where can I find studies about it? Again, I know this is sensitive and I am just curious from a biological standpoint.

[–] TranscendentalEmpire@lemm.ee 126 points 8 months ago (10 children)

blocking puberty has some crazy side effects.

I'm a provider at a children's hospital. I specialize in orthopedics and rehabilitation, so I mostly deal with the musculoskeletal system. I have colleagues who would be able to provide a much better and more in depth explanation, but I will do my best.

Even in orthopedics "hormone blockers" are used fairly frequently. For example the same drugs that people use to transition are utilized to moderate the epiphyseal fusion of growth plates. Puberty is also frequently delayed to moderate the hormone levels of juvenile cancer patients. Or even more increasingly common, to halt the symptoms of precocious puberty in young women.

The vast majority of juveniles prescribed hormones to delay puberty are for non gender affirming care like cancer. The problem with moderating what medical providers can and can't treat is that you are assuming you know more about medicine than the a person who went to medical school.

You may be trying to protect kids, but what ends up happening is an interference of medical care, and usually not the type you intended. If hormone drugs become more monitored, providers may be hesitant, or have a more difficult brine prescribing it.

The dangers of delaying puberty are very small, when you stop the prescription puberty begins again. Usually the only side effect is excessive growth due to a delay if epiphyseal fusion. In regards to gender affirming care, I will remind people that their providers are looking at total outcomes. Meaning they are factoring in things like the higher potentiality of self harm and suicide.

load more comments (10 replies)
[–] Omniraptor@lemm.ee 37 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

Precocious puberty has been a thing forever and the first medications for delaying it by regulating hormones have been around since the 1980s. I think that should be the jumping off point for research. However afaik the same sorts of drugs are also commonly used to treat cancer in adults.

Here is an article about their use in treating trans people with links to various studies https://transfemscience.org/articles/puberty-blockers/

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] assassin_aragorn@lemmy.world 26 points 8 months ago

How long has this medical technology been in use and where can I find studies about it?

Decades. It was there when I was a kid, so like 20 years ago. And it wasn't new medical technology at the time.

[–] UnderpantsWeevil@lemmy.world 22 points 8 months ago

I have to imagine that blocking puberty has some crazy side effects.

Sort of the joke. Puberty is what has the crazy side effects.

load more comments (16 replies)
[–] Buffalox@lemmy.world 41 points 8 months ago

I thought quackery was illegal, but apparently not when it's *fundamentalists in politics.

*Fundamentalists as in fundamentally sociopaths.

[–] toastus@feddit.de 40 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (7 children)

Whoever decided this can shove a cactus up somewhere.

Fuck you for hurting the most vulnerable;
disgusting decision by disgusting people.

load more comments (7 replies)
[–] kirbowo808@kbin.social 21 points 8 months ago (2 children)

Another Tory L as usual.

Can’t wait till the day comes when they’re out of the gov for good.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] mathemachristian@lemm.ee 21 points 8 months ago

welcome to TERF island

load more comments
view more: next ›