this post was submitted on 18 Jun 2023
100 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30540 readers
209 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 40 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] jjakc@lemthony.com 36 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Going the Apple route of making products more confusing, nice.

[–] Sami@lemmy.zip 40 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

Lots of companies are guilty of this. Nvidia and SSD manufacturers with their stealth downgrades under same product name and the entirety of the monitor space:

[–] PenguinTD@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

well, the monitor names actually follow some sense even if they look weird.

[–] ag_roberston_author@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The apple chips are very straightforward though?

M1, M2 for generation, and (nothing), Pro, Ultra, Max for level.

[–] jjakc@lemthony.com 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I want to buy a second hand iPad or MacBook. How am I meant to know which one is which gen?

The only product they have that is clear and somewhat easy for consumers is the iPhone.

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Always irked me. Not even apple fanboys i know could tell which is which until they know the date of release.

You don't intuitively know which quarter of which year which version of a different device with the same name is at a glance?

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They all have model numbers that are on the back of the device and easy to look up

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Interesting because everyone i know always went "which macbook pro is that? Q3 2018?"

Or is the number system a new addition? Most of my apple. Experience was in uni a good while ago

[–] snowbell@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It is as old as I can remember, they are just never referred to those numbers in marketing material. Not the best way to do it but they are there.

[–] shapesandstuff@feddit.de 1 points 1 year ago

Ok well :'D

[–] icy_mal@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Are you not excited for the "Intel Core 9 1900H Mid 2023"?

[–] SeatBeeSate@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (3 children)

But why? It was easy and recognizable.

[–] Wiredfire@kayb.ee 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Harder to recognise makes it easier to up-sell crappier models to those not close enough to the detail. I was mulling over going AMD with the next laptop (which admittedly won’t be any time soon), this makes me lean more towards that idea.

[–] Widget@kbin.social 12 points 1 year ago (6 children)
[–] briongloid@aussie.zone 5 points 1 year ago

The two market leaders woke up and chose violence

[–] cryball@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 year ago

It's got some fluff, but it's basically the same as any gpu in the last 15 years. First number for generation, second for comparing performance within the generation.

[–] n0stalghia@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

It has all the info about the CPU in the name, that's kinda cool

[–] Wiredfire@kayb.ee 1 points 1 year ago
[–] Viktorian@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago

Weird scheme but at least high number good.

[–] lixus98@kbin.social 10 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

So it can confuse buyers, and they buy a lower generation for a higher price

[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Yup, oems will sell last gen or older in new laptops.

[–] ghostalmedia@beehaw.org 3 points 1 year ago

Was it though? Maybe to people like us, but not to my folks.

Personally, I‘d prefer some sort of naming convention that was like Apple’s. Generation number, then some sort of Good, Better, Best name tacked on the back.

That said, the words Apple picked for Good-Better-Best are kind of stupid and not as clear as the could be.

[–] pitl@lemmy.sdf.org 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

... well, that's going to be incredibly confusing.

[–] SkepticElliptic@beehaw.org 11 points 1 year ago

They had already gotten confusing when they started selling dual core i5 processors.

[–] TheOtherJake@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's because of Moore's law. Unless Intel responds to AMD's openSIL initiative to open the bootloader initialization API, it doesn't matter what they do. The ability to finally run an entirely secure x86 computer hasn't existed in 15 years since the i-core/ryzen series. OpenSIL means Intel doesn't even exist any more IMO.

[–] SlamDrag@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm confused, why does OpenSIL matter to this announcement?

[–] TheOtherJake@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

They are no longer hardware relevant. Marketing obscurity will only make it worse.

[–] SlamDrag@beehaw.org 13 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Okay but what I'm getting at is why does OpenSIL make them hardware irrelevant? I'm not a programmer, I don't know why a firmware library matters at all in this case, can you explain that to me?

[–] TheOtherJake@beehaw.org 31 points 1 year ago (4 children)

There are several vulnerabilities in bootloaders that have not been fixed. Namely, there is an entire tiny operating system that is used to initialize the processor before the main bootloader begins. Then the bootloader creates a bunch of handles to control the hardware, and hands them over to the operating system kernel. The i-core/ryzen processors include the second generation of this tiny underlying operating system that runs before everything else. This tiny operating system was originally marketed as a way to remotely monitor and troubleshoot data center servers, but this is a very weak and flawed marketing strategy. The way this system runs before everything else, it has root/admin privileges and access that supersede everything that comes after it. A bad actor accessing this system is absolutely game over for all hardware including the bootloader itself. Well this tiny operating system is tied to the microcode for the processor generation.

If you know anything about old computers that had a bunch of boards and chips inside the case, modern computers still have all of these chips and systems, but they are all integrated into just a few chips. These systems are still complicated and have a certain way they must be powered up and initialized so that each system begins in a specific state along a long chain. The "microcode" in a modern computer is really just a bunch of "software" that controls the order that the hardware is brought online. In the i-core/ryzen generation of hardware the microcode is proprietary and copyright protected. This is a way to get around many x86 patents expiring. It has long been speculated that the tiny operating system is also a back door for governments as it can completely own any system regardless of encryption or any other security measures.

There is a way to mostly disable this tiny operating system but there is no way to monitor or confirm its activity at run time. OpenSIL is like having access to the control room of this tiny operating system for the first time. It means it is now possible to completely secure and verify the state of a system. There is no security in obscurity. OpenSIL is the removal of a major failed attempt at security through obscurity.

Ultimately, at the most fundamental level, openSIL means full ownership over your hardware. I can buy AMD, but can only rent Intel. Intel keeps ownership of this tiny little corner of the hardware and they have done a terrible job of managing what they own. When faced with that buying choice the outcome should be obvious, assuming you are able to run the software that can take advantage of this. It will take at least a few months, but there should soon be a completely open source version of Coreboot that will use openSIL. Hope this helps.

[–] sirvesa@beehaw.org 7 points 1 year ago

Thank you for the in depth explanation!

[–] renard_roux@beehaw.org 6 points 1 year ago

Thank you, a lot of stuff there I didn't know! 👍

[–] Katharta@beehaw.org 5 points 1 year ago

This is bestof material right here. Thanks.

[–] Hexorg@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Isn’t there a speculation that Intel CPUS are actually RISC chips with microcode emulating x86?

[–] interolivary@beehaw.org 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

It's not speculation, it's verified fact ever since the Pentium 6 in the mid-90's. See eg this or this

[–] Hexorg@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago

Ah my bad, I did a quick search before commenting and couldn’t find anything concrete.

[–] pasci_lei@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

This is going to backfire really hard.

[–] The_Hunted_One@beehaw.org 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just a friendly heads up, but this is likely better suited for !technology@beehaw.org rather than Gaming

[–] DaleGribble88@programming.dev 1 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the heads up, I'm still learning about where the different communities are on here. Also, subscribed! :)

load more comments
view more: next ›