this post was submitted on 24 Jul 2023
287 points (89.1% liked)

Confidently Incorrect

4003 readers
1 users here now

When people are way too smug about their wrong answer.

Posting guidelines.

All posts in this community have come from elsewhere, it is not original content, the poster in this community is not OP. The person who posts in this community isn’t necessarily endorsing whatever the post is talking about and they are not looking to argue with you about the content in the post.

You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

There is currently no rule about how recent a post needs to be because the community is about the comeback part, not the topic.

Rules:

• Be civil and remember the human.

• No trolling, insults or name calling. Swearing in general is fine, but not to insult someone.

• No bigotry of any kind, including homophobia, transphobia, sexism and racism.

• You are welcome to discuss and debate any topic but arguments are not welcome here. I consider debate/discussions to be civil; people with different opinions participating in respectful conversations. It becomes an argument as soon as someone becomes aggressive, nasty, insulting or just plain unpleasant. Report argumentative comments, then ignore them.

• Try not to get too political. A lot of these posts will involve politics, but this isn’t the place for political arguments.

• Participate in good faith - don’t be aggressive and don’t argue for arguements sake.

• Mark NSFW posts if they contain nudity.

• Satire is allowed but please start the post title with [satire] so other users can filter it out if they’d like.

Please report comments that break site or community rules to the mods. If you break the rules you’ll receive one warning before being banned from this community.

This community follows the rules of the lemmy.world instance and the lemmy.org code of conduct. I’ve summarised them here:

  1. Be civil, remember the human.
  2. No insulting or harassing other members. That includes name calling.
  3. Respect differences of opinion. Civil discussion/debate is fine, arguing is not. Criticise ideas, not people.
  4. Keep unrequested/unstructured critique to a minimum.
  5. Remember we have all chosen to be here voluntarily. Respect the spent time and effort people have spent creating posts in order to share something they find amusing with you.
  6. Swearing in general is fine, swearing to insult another commenter isn’t.
  7. No racism, sexism, homophobia, transphobia, xenophobia or any other type of bigotry.
  8. No incitement of violence or promotion of violent ideologies.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 43 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ImplyingImplications@lemmy.ca 128 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Isn't that a parody account?

[–] flip@lemmy.nbsp.one 44 points 1 year ago
[–] curryandbeans@lemmy.world 32 points 1 year ago

Yeah he’s hilarious

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 12 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I genuinely find it hard to tell on LinkedIn sometimes. But satire is fine here. If/when we have the ability to add post flairs I’ll make them so people can filter out satire if they don’t want to see it.

[–] Mechanize@feddit.it 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

You could start by manually tagging them in the title, for example with a [satire] or [S] tag at the start of it.

That would enable people with apps who already have word filters to do it already if they are univocal, standard and enforced enough.

This would make it a lot easier to automatically modify and flair them in the future too, if the feature ever comes.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Good idea. I’ll update the rules. Thanks!

[–] xthedeerlordx@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think satire fits this community

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Thank you for the input, but I created the community, wrote the rules and made this post. As mentioned, all satire posts require a tag so you can filter them out if you wish. In about a months time I’ll make a stickied post asking if anyone would like to mod with me, and for feedback about the rules and how this community is managed in general. I have no desire to be an overly authoritarian mod so I look forward to refining the rules so that the majority of subscribers are in agreement, but we’ve still very new so I think we need to give it a few weeks to let the community build up and for people beside me to make posts. Until then I hope you’re able to enjoy the 90% of post that aren’t satire. Thanks again for your input.

[–] xthedeerlordx@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago

that's fair

[–] krash@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

I barely notice any difference between LinkedIn and shlinkedIn 😄

[–] Lexam@lemmy.ca 21 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Dude sitting on the floor of his unfurnished studio apartment eating the plan white rice.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Nah, white rice is too expensive now that India has capped exports.

[–] Thagthebarbarian@lemmy.world 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Habitual inclusion of sales tax but not other fees

At 15 per ticket it's more like $42

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

it baffles me that tax isn't included in the price. Here, what is on the sticker is how much you pay.

[–] Gangreless@lemmy.world 0 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Every state and every city can have different tax rates, that's why

[–] gmtom@lemmy.world 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Every time this is brought up Americans give this excuse.

The tesco express down the road has different prices for almost everything compared to the big tesco 200 metres away from it and yet somehow through the magic of modern technology can print different price labels to each other and have different prices in their database systems. It's wild.

[–] marzipan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

As an American, I think it’s one of those dumb things that before technology made stuff easier it made sense. But technology advanced and companies didn’t because the impetuous would be on them and “can’t have that”. Kind of like how checks are still used much more in the States compared to Europe where they’re for all intents and purposes obsolete, because the US didn’t adopt sensible free bank transfers in the same way Europe did.

[–] somebody29 1 points 1 year ago

It’s not like we don’t have “deals” to make goods look cheaper than they are here either. You can still trick consumers while posting the true price.

[–] StarManta@lemmy.world 14 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

That’s not why. It could still be required that taxes are included in the price. Franchises jn different locations already have different prices anyway (you think the price for a Big Mac is the same in NYC as it is in a suburb in Ohio?)

It’s literally just so that businesses can advertise costs that are lower than what they are. Same reason Ticketmaster has 14 different convenience fees and tipping is a cultural norm rather than paying servers a living wage to begin with.

[–] Norgur@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Which is not confusing or anything, luckily

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 4 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Are you American? If so, would you prefer to have the price include all taxes up front, or is there some benefit of having prices listed like this?

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The benefit is to the corporations. Tickets seem cheaper when you are planning, even though we all know it will be more expensive. Something to do with our dumb monkey brains

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I know I’d eventually get used to it but I’d find that so annoying if I moved to the US.

[–] Chocrates@lemmy.world 2 points 1 year ago

Yeah true, it's so pervasive that I don't even think about it. It is anti consumer and manipulative and frustrating

[–] Ambiorickx@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The reason is that politicians of a certain persuasion don’t want taxes to be “hidden.” They want them to be open and explicit to keep people angry at the government for taking so much of their money.

There is, in truth, also an advantage for retailers. They can advertise one price for the whole country, or a whole state or whatever, and not need to worry about the thousands upon thousands of different tax jurisdictions with not only different rates, but different categories that products and services can fall into.

For the consumer, it all means you have no fucking clue what you’ll actually end up paying.

[–] aeternum@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

Australia has one tax rate for goods and services. It's called the GST. Why can't america do that?

[–] glibg10b@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Imagine getting downvoted for a question

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago

A pretty benign one at that, but oh well.

[–] Efwis@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I am American and there is no benefit to not having the prices reflect after taxation, unless you’re some kind of big business where they screw over the patrons at the register like Walmart does.

The problem is that every location has different tax rates. For example here in Texas I pay 8 cents on the dollar where I live, but other locations have a city and/or a county tax which is added to the 8 cents per dollar state tax.

[–] SomeoneElse@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

But shops sell the same items at a different prices anyway. It’s not like the manufacture sets the prices, the retailer does. You occasionally see RRP (recommended retail price) on the product packaging in the UK, but the price you pay is the price the shop lists. Surely in America each store has to print the price stickler/labels themselves, so I don’t understand why this is a valid reason.

I’m not demanding an explanation from you btw- thank you for the response, I appreciate the insight. I’m just genuinely confused to why this is way of pricing items is even allowed!

[–] BiNonBi@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Unified marketing within a chain. McDonald's and the like can advertise their $5 special nation wide and not have to worry about every locale's specific tax.

We also have a metric shit tons of tax jurisdictions. Every state, county, city and special district can add their own tax. I wouldn't be surprised if there are over 100,000 tax jurisdictions in the US. The people who set the price for a specific good don't have to worry about tax cutting into the margin. That's saved for someone else, usually a firm who specializes in tax calculations, at the point of sales.

[–] marzipan@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Just to add on to this, for those who want to understand just how dumb and minute it is, I have different sales tax rates in different parts of my city. 🙃

[–] Shialac@lemmy.world 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Its not that hard to print different price Tags. Here in Europe they even manage to print the packaging in different languages in the same chain one country over

[–] Efwis@lemmy.zip 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I never said we were the smartest people in the world. But alas, like I said, there are companies that will promote a price either on the shelf or in an ad and then when you get to the register and you’re not paying attention to prices ringing up, the price can be up to $3 USD higher than you saw.

Elantra is one that comes to mind for this really bad not to mention if you have 2 or more stores in one town the prices will reflect differently based on its location in the city.

For example in my hometown there are 2 Walmart stores. One on the east side and one on the west side. The east side, which is a poorer section of town the prices are 3%-5% higher then the one on the west side, which is more prosperous in income. Their reasoning behind this is a simple case of this standing. The east side store customer base buys things they need where those on the west side buys more things that they want. So they price gouge the customer base with less disposable income.

[–] Efwis@lemmy.zip 1 points 1 year ago

My system acted up, so I reposted this as a reply to my reply.

I never said we were the smartest people in the world. But alas, like I said, we here are companies that will promote a price either on the shelf or in an ad and then when you get to the register and you’re not paying attention to prices ringing up, the price can be up to $3 USD higher than you saw.

Walmart is one that comes to mind for this really bad, not to mention if you have 2 or more stores in one town the prices will reflect differently based on its location in the city.

For example in my hometown we have 2 walmart stores. One on the east side and one on the west side. The east side, which is a poorer section of town, the prices are 3%-5% higher than the one on the west side which is more financial prosperous in income. Their reasoning behind this is a simple case of this standing. The east side store customer base buys things they need where those on the west side buys more things that they want. So they price gouge the customer base with less disposable income.

[–] RamSwamson@lemmy.sdf.org 10 points 1 year ago (2 children)

My buddy wanted to use a 25% off coupon from fandango when we were buying tickets, so they used fandango and I used the theater’s website to purchase tickets. They had a service fee while I did not and in the end they saved a whopping ¢25 over me.

[–] Rootiest@lemm.ee 4 points 1 year ago

I mean they still came out on top.

I thought you were gonna say it cost them more in the end

[–] Buddahriffic@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Those fucking "service fees" should be regulated. It's all just part of the cost so include it in the price instead of adding it on last second and acting like they have no control over it. I think final price should be what is advertised when possible, with a breakdown offered in addition to that if that's helpful. Obviously certain things like taxes and shipping can depend on the buyer's location, but a good faith effort to show the final cost should be made, including allowing users to anonymously put that information in to see what the final cost works out to.

IMO it's all manipulative salesmanship to not advertise the final price, but especially so when it's just that site or service adding in their own fees or other fees that should have been considered their cost of doing business.

And especially fuck fees when they are used to manipulate numbers life "profit" to avoid taxes or fuck over people who think a product will be profitable when the other side is negotiating based on whether a company will be profitable (and deliberately structure it so that it won't).

[–] RamSwamson@lemmy.sdf.org 3 points 1 year ago

You’re preaching to the choir! While they fiddled trying to get the promo code applied they ended up losing their selected seats, it was a huge waste of time for them. Modern day capitalism is tricking the consumer into buying their product. “You’ve already made it this far, what’s a few more fees before you check out?” is a terrible business model.

[–] LazaroFilm@lemmy.world 9 points 1 year ago

As a camera operator, going to the movies makes me richer.

load more comments
view more: next ›